Michael Sperber <sperber(a)informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes in
xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org:
>>>>> "sb" == SL Baur
<steve(a)xemacs.org> writes:
sb> Michael Sperber
<sperber(a)informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org:
...
Notwithstanding the general brokenness of Motif, this is really a
problem with IBM's fucked-up distribution of it. At least in theory
it's possible someone with a service contract will send a Problem
Report to IBM, and with some luck, it will get fixed.
I don't have any comment. That's such a great quote, I had to see it
in print again. :-)
...
sb> Death to Motif. Good riddance to bad rubbish. I think it's a serious
sb> mistake defaulting to Motif support.
I like this idea a lot. Since this change would be trivial and not
really affect anything we've tested, couldn't we make it so for 21.0?
It's O.K. with me if the patch can get committed immediately to the
source tree for some minimal testing.
>> BTW: We still do need a note in PROBLEMS about AIX X libXt,
don't we?
sb> That would be good.
Coming up.
O.K.