8:53 p.m.
Changing the cast from CBufbyte to char* will allow XEmacs to compile.
"Dr. Jens Winkler" wrote:
It failed with:
fileio.c: In function `Fexpand_file_name':
fileio.c:955: `CBufbyte' undeclared (first use in this function)
fileio.c:955: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
fileio.c:955: for each function it appears in.)
fileio.c:955: parse error before `)'
make[1]: *** [fileio.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/xemacs-21.4.6/src'
make: *** [src] Error 2
Jens
6:59 a.m.
New subject: Can't compile XEmacs 21.4.6 under cygwin
>>>> "daveroth" == daveroth <David>
writes:
daveroth> Changing the cast from CBufbyte to char* will allow
daveroth> XEmacs to compile.
Maybe, but this fault is no longer in CVS AFAICT. I strongly advise
reupdating your trees, as they are clearly corrupt if they have
"CBufbyte" still in them.
If more than one person has seen this, we need to figure out how that
erroneous code is getting distributed. Please give us details on how
you updated your source trees.
--
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Don't ask how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
9:02 p.m.
New subject: Can't compile XEmacs 21.4.6 under cygwin
Stephen J. Turnbull writes:
...
If more than one person has seen this, we need to figure out how that
erroneous code is getting distributed. Please give us details on how
you updated your source trees.
Sorry, a clean xemacs-21.4.5 source tree with patches for 21.4.6. is
compiling. I must have old code lying around. Once again sorry :-{
Although patching the above source tree with
xemacs-21.4.5-21.4.6.patch.gz generates the following (harmless?)
errors.
patching file `./CHANGES-release'
patching file `./ChangeLog'
patching file `./Makefile.in.in'
patching file `./PROBLEMS'
patching file `./configure'
patching file `./configure.in'
patching file `./configure.usage'
patching file `./etc/package-index.LATEST.pgp'
patching file `./lib-src/ChangeLog'
patching file `./lisp/ChangeLog'
patching file `./lisp/code-files.el'
patching file `./lisp/cus-edit.el'
patching file `./lisp/cus-face.el'
patching file `./lisp/dialog-gtk.el'
patching file `./lisp/dialog.el'
patching file `./lisp/faces.el'
patching file `./lisp/font.el'
patching file `./lisp/gtk-faces.el'
patching file `./lisp/minibuf.el'
patching file `./lisp/package-get.el'
patching file `./lisp/package-net.el'
patching file `./lisp/toolbar-items.el'
patching file `./lwlib/ChangeLog'
patching file `./man/ChangeLog'
patching file `./man/Makefile'
patching file `./man/lispref/glyphs.texi'
patching file `./man/lispref/intro.texi'
patching file `./man/lispref/lispref.texi'
patching file `./man/lispref/objects.texi'
patching file `./man/lispref/packaging.texi'
This file doesn't appear to be the 1.2.2.11 version -- patch anyway? [n] y
patching file `./netinstall/ChangeLog'
Hunk #2 FAILED at 292.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to ./netinstall/ChangeLog.rej
patching file `./netinstall/Makefile.in.in'
patching file `./netinstall/choose.cc'
patching file `./netinstall/desktop.cc'
patching file `./netinstall/dialog.h'
patching file `./netinstall/download.cc'
patching file `./netinstall/geturl.cc'
patching file `./netinstall/ini.h'
patching file `./netinstall/init.cc'
patching file `./netinstall/localdir.cc'
patching file `./netinstall/log.cc'
patching file `./netinstall/main.cc'
patching file `./netinstall/msg.cc'
patching file `./netinstall/net.cc'
patching file `./netinstall/nio-ftp.cc'
patching file `./netinstall/nio-ie5.cc'
patching file `./netinstall/regedit.cc'
patching file `./netinstall/regedit.h'
patching file `./netinstall/reginfo.h'
patching file `./netinstall/res.rc'
Hunk #1 FAILED at 33.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 142.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 216.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 274.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 325.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 469.
Hunk #7 FAILED at 487.
Hunk #8 FAILED at 516.
8 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to ./netinstall/res.rc.rej
patching file `./netinstall/resource.h'
Hunk #1 FAILED at 28.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 55.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 96.
3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to ./netinstall/resource.h.rej
patching file `./netinstall/root.cc'
patching file `./netinstall/setup.mak'
patching file `./netinstall/source.cc'
patching file `./netinstall/splash.cc'
patching file `./netinstall/state.h'
patching file `./netinstall/uninstall.cc'
patching file `./nt/ChangeLog'
patching file `./src/ChangeLog'
patching file `./src/alloc.c'
patching file `./src/buffer.c'
patching file `./src/dialog-msw.c'
patching file `./src/dired.c'
patching file `./src/editfns.c'
patching file `./src/event-msw.c'
patching file `./src/event-stream.c'
patching file `./src/fileio.c'
patching file `./src/general-slots.h'
patching file `./src/lisp.h'
patching file `./src/ntheap.c'
patching file `./src/scrollbar-msw.c'
patching file `./src/search.c'
patching file `./src/syswindows.h'
patching file `./src/win32.c'
patching file `./src/window.c'
patching file `./tests/ChangeLog'
patching file `./version.sh'
I believe this shouldnt happen :-(
It seems a failure in netinstall.
Jens
9:04 a.m.
New subject: Can't compile XEmacs 21.4.6 under cygwin
>>>> "Jens" == Jens Winkler <Dr.> writes:
Jens> Although patching the above source tree with
Jens> xemacs-21.4.5-21.4.6.patch.gz generates the following
Jens> (harmless?) errors.
As long as you aren't Andy, you can ignore netinstaller errors.
There's a good chance that the problem is version control strings in
the files. It is very hard to create good patches under version
control if keyword expansion is used.
--
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Don't ask how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
8367
days inactive
8369
days old
4 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Andy Piper -
David -
Dr. Jens Winkler -
Stephen J. Turnbull