"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> Ar an t-ochtú lá déag de mí na Nollaig, scríobh Stephen J. Turnbull:
> > The reported memory doesn't seem unreasonable; Gnus conses like it's
> > going out of style.
> The bloat does not stop, though.
I know, I'm saying the memory usage *reported by XEmacs* seems
reasonable. The bloat is not accounted for by objects we count, not
even as a proportion, right?
M-: (garbage-collect) RET
returns nil, garbage will not be collected due to pure space overflow
At least that is the situation with Emacs, and there might be
something similar with XEmacs.
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
XEmacs-Beta mailing list