Re: [comp.emacs.xemacs] Re: Are GNU- and XEmacs hoplessly forked?

Darryl> Adrian.Aichner(a)t-online.de (Adrian Aichner) wrote: Darryl> We do. Darryl> Sorry, I was a bit peeved because (1) the updated docs were a Darryl> direct result of David's original complaints four months ago (and he's Darryl> still complaining ;-(), (2) he obviously hadn't seen my response to him Darryl> or the updated docs, and (3) the online docs on the XEmacs website do Darryl> not appear to have been updated in months (sorry, I really shouldn't Darryl> complain about this, given my own history ;-). Darryl> Thanks, but I just found a problem with the website. If you go to Darryl> the XEmacs homepage, and click on: Darryl> * "Docmentation" (under "Getting XEmacs" in the left-hand column). Darryl> * "lispref" (under "XEmacs Info Manuals in HTML format ... XEmacs 21.5"). Darryl> * "44. Glyphs". Darryl> You end up at: Darryl> http://www.xemacs.org/Documentation/beta/html/lispref_45.html#SEC635 Darryl> Which, unfortunately, is the old (21.4?) documentation, Darryl> instead of the Darryl> 21.5 docs. Yes, I'm still sorking on an update to http://www.xemacs.org/Documentation/index.html. What about http://www.xemacs.org/Documentation/21.5/html/lispref_47.html#SEC670 then? I thought 21.4 did not have examples? I have checked out HEAD to build these docs. Can you please let me know which label your docs are supposed to be on? Best regards, Adrian Darryl> [ Actually, there's nothing wrong with it being 21.4 docs, except that Darryl> it's labeled as 21.5 docs. ] Darryl> -- Darryl> Darryl Okahata Darryl> darrylo(a)soco.agilent.com Darryl> DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not Darryl> constitute the support, opinion, or policy of Agilent Technologies, or Darryl> of the little green men that have been following him all day. -- Adrian Aichner mailto:adrian＠xemacs.org http://www.xemacs.org/