Re: [PATCH] Xft patch reloaded, #3

Hrvoje> I'm personally using Mule (for Latin 2), and I'm not aware Hrvoje> of this huge list of XEmacs features broken under Mule. ms> Windows? Stephen> That's both historically false and practically an irrelevant analogy. Stephen> Historically, Mule did not break Windows. Windows broke Mule. You'll note that Hrvoje chose this particular way of putting things. In fact, the analogy holds for Xft. The sentence would be "Xft breaks Mule." Stephen> They _did not_ make that offer. I'm probably dense, but they didn't give off that impression to me. I'll talk to Eric later today. Stephen> It has _not_ benefitted at all from Martin's anal-retentive Stephen> attention to bug-fixing (or yours to stat(2)-removal), Huh? I actually resisted anal-retentive attempts to optimize stat removal. I implemented a couple of wishes made by others. Stephen> Doesn't this bother you at all? Why are you fighting a request for Stephen> some badly needed clean-up as the price of getting approval for a Stephen> feature that will aggravate the need for the requested clean-up? I didn't. I fought just about once. I explicitly said that everything you said about this patch is valid. Will you *please* read what I wrote. I asked you to write up a plan acceptable to you. Are you're effectively saying there is none? -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla