ibuffer question [was: [ANNOUNCE] Updated packages in Pre-Release - Feb 23]

SY> Hey there everyone. SY> I have just added the following packages to the 'Pre-Releases' SY> directory: SY> New Packages in Pre-Release: SY> =========================== SY> bbdb-1.19-pkg.tar.gz SY> edit-utils-1.78-pkg.tar.gz SY> eudc-1.36-pkg.tar.gz SY> ibuffer-1.00-pkg.tar.gz *** New Package *** SY> net-utils-1.24-pkg.tar.gz SY> prog-modes-1.50-pkg.tar.gz SY> psgml-1.27-pkg.tar.gz SY> tramp-1.03-pkg.tar.gz APA> 7 lines matching /pkginfo/MANIFEST in buffer *Package Output*. APA> 1:./pkginfo/MANIFEST.bbdb APA> 64:./pkginfo/MANIFEST.edit-utils APA> 195:./pkginfo/MANIFEST.eudc APA> 220:./pkginfo/MANIFEST.net-utils APA> 245:./pkginfo/MANIFEST.prog-modes APA> 322:./pkginfo/MANIFEST.psgml APA> 481:./pkginfo/MANIFEST.tramp APA> Ah, forgot ibuffer which I installed as well now. Hi John Paul, hi Steve! Educated fooling around has not led any information how ibuffer should officially be activated. I seem to recall that binding C-x C-b to 'ibuffer was suggested before. Is this The Right Thing? What's the correct idiom to state "I want to use ibuffer instead of list-buffers."? Best regards, Adrian APA> Adrian -- Adrian Aichner mailto:adrian＠xemacs.org http://www.xemacs.org/