Re: [comp.emacs.xemacs] Re: Are GNU- and XEmacs hoplessly forked?
Adrian.Aichner(a)t-online.de (Adrian Aichner) wrote:
I thought 21.4 did not have examples?
It (21.4) doesn't have examples.
My point (which wasn't too clear) is that the docs page talks about
"21.5 docs" but instead refers to 21.4 docs. We need to correct this
inconsistency, either by having pointers to both 21.4 and 21.5 docs, or
by simply pointing to your actual 21.5 docs. I don't think it really
matters which approach is used, as long as the inconsistency is fixed.
Can you please let me know which label your docs are supposed to be
on?
Stephen's answer is correct.
--
Darryl Okahata
darrylo(a)soco.agilent.com
DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not
constitute the support, opinion, or policy of Agilent Technologies, or
of the little green men that have been following him all day.