Re: GC_CHECK_NOT_FREE/USE_KKCC makes build fail
Stephen J. Turnbull writes:
Chris, if the patch is blatantly wrong, or even quite possibly not
good enough, please send it to xemacs-beta, not xemacs-patches.
xemacs-patches is for patches that (at least in your opinion) should
be applied as is to the distribution (ie, CVS) sources. It also
records the reviewers' workflow.
I understand.
Ironically, Mike's patch was identical to mine except that he also
removed the now-redundant macro definition. :)
OTOH, on xemacs-beta it will get more discussion. Eg, obviously the
person who committed that patch is not building in your configuration;
in this case it's a generic configure --use-kkcc=NO bug and in theory
he could have caught it, but suppose it were dependent on MacOS?
--use-kkcc=NO would have resulted in a compiler warning about an unused
definition, I think.
Right now I think only one reviewer is building regularly on MacOS,
I build almost daily.
and IIRC he's more interested in the new Carbon stuff than the
Darwin
platform.
There's Carbon support in XEmacs?
--
Chris music is what numbers feel like San Francisco, CA