"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
David Kastrup quotes Artemio Gonzalez:
> > That's due to a bug in XEmacs 21.5 related to the function
> > `with-syntax-table' I reported over two years ago to the XEmacs
The syntax table stuff is unlikely to get fixed by XEmacs core
developers until Ben returns, because it hooks into various processes
at a rather low level. If somebody wants to invest in studying that
stuff and produce a patch, I'd be happy to review.
> So Artemio, you might want to add your voice to this problem getting
Inciting to riot should be beneath you, David. But be my guest: I
have plenty of nagging voices in my head, but I've learned to ignore
them. I can ignore one more.
Quite funny. Too bad that it is also quite sad. You tell me when
reporting bugs affecting AUCTeX users that there is no priority to fix
them because nobody else complains about them. When I tell others to
complain to you instead of to us, you accuse me of "inciting to riot"
and declare that you can ignore reports regardless of their number.
Is this supposed to be 忠義 or 悌?
That's true of everybody. XEmacs is a user-supported project;
things get fixed when people contribute fixes. All you contribute,
though, is abuse. More abuse? No, thank you.
I asked Artemio to report his problem, possibly including a screen
shot for illustration. You consider bug reports abuse, before you
even see them?
That certainly explains a _lot_ about your past replies to them. And
I thought it was just my unique talent of phrasing them.
XEmacs-Beta mailing list