Re: [comp.emacs.xemacs] Re: Are GNU- and XEmacs hoplessly forked?

Adrian.Aichner(a)t-online.de (Adrian Aichner) wrote: Sorry, I was a bit peeved because (1) the updated docs were a direct result of David's original complaints four months ago (and he's still complaining ;-(), (2) he obviously hadn't seen my response to him or the updated docs, and (3) the online docs on the XEmacs website do not appear to have been updated in months (sorry, I really shouldn't complain about this, given my own history ;-). Thanks, but I just found a problem with the website. If you go to the XEmacs homepage, and click on: * "Docmentation" (under "Getting XEmacs" in the left-hand column). * "lispref" (under "XEmacs Info Manuals in HTML format ... XEmacs 21.5"). * "44. Glyphs". You end up at: http://www.xemacs.org/Documentation/beta/html/lispref_45.html#SEC635 Which, unfortunately, is the old (21.4?) documentation, instead of the 21.5 docs. [ Actually, there's nothing wrong with it being 21.4 docs, except that it's labeled as 21.5 docs. ] -- Darryl Okahata darrylo(a)soco.agilent.com DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not constitute the support, opinion, or policy of Agilent Technologies, or of the little green men that have been following him all day.