"Ben Wing" <ben(a)666.com> wrote:
> Let me do a few experiments and report back. If the field
> stuff turns out to be optional for the GUD/GDB stuff I want
> do to, then I'll vote for moving field.el into core.
Well, the newest dabbrev I just checked in uses field.el as well, but only
Hmmm.... It looks like the field interface is being used in more and
more Emacs lisp. Our hands may be tied. Okay, I'll ponder Stephen's
suggestions more deeply to see if there is some way to avoid the startup