Re: AW: [A] Re: Patches for the first release of ECB as regular Xemac s package
On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 12:48, Berndl, Klaus wrote:
APA> AFAIK we currently don't have a standard where under
etc HTML
APA> documentation should go in package installations.
>how about a html/packagename in the install tree ??
>or maybe www/packagename would be more appropriate considering the posibility of XML
>
>becoming the new default for www documents then we wouldnt have to rename it later
I like "html" better than "www", since it's not "www"
when you have a
bunch of HTML files on your local disk. Hmm, "markup", "hypertext"?
Uh, but info files are kind of hypertext too, and markup isn't really
interesting...?
Yes, sounds good for me. But currently I'm most intersted how to
edit
the Makefile (how to deal with HTML_STAGING??) of the new ECB package
so that the generated html-files are
1. Installed in xemacs-packages/www/ecb (or xemacs-packages/html/ecb) after
calling "make install"
ISTR "make install" does that if you add "html" to the end of the
"all::" target in ecb/Makefile. ISTR also that it makes the HTML files
land in xemacs-packages/html (<- no package name there). Maybe that's
good enough?
2. Included in the binary dirstib in the same place after calling
"make bindist"
I can take a look at this. Probably it won't happen before the weekend,
and I don't mind if someone beats me to it.
--
\/ille Skyttä
scop at xemacs.org