Re: M-q inconsistent between cc-mode & cperl-mode

Yoshiki> Is he still maintaining cperl-mode? Stephen> IIRC, yes. Yoshiki> I thought he was too busy to maintain it and XEmacs Yoshiki> Development Team took over the maintenance. Maintainer Yoshiki> comment in cperl-mode.el agrees with what I thought. Last time I contacted Ilya, he said that he wouldn't have much time for cperl-mode, but he still welcomed patches. I think we should still send patches to Ilya when we apply them to our prog-modes package (to cperl-mode.el). Stephen> For us, yes. But we're not the primary source as we are Stephen> for (eg) edict and footnote. IIRC, Ilya (a) disagreed Stephen> with a change somebody here decided was required, and (b) Stephen> didn't want to deal with XEmacs bureaucracy to take over Stephen> XEmacs maintenance himself, that's all. Stephen> I could be wrong. We should figure out how to document Stephen> this kind of case, though. Eg, similar deal with JDE, Yep. Stephen> although Paul K is much more obviously active as a Stephen> maintainer, and JDE activity level is much higher, so Stephen> confusion is unlikely. Stephen> Suggestions? Steve Y.? Stephen> -- Stephen> Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp Stephen> University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Stephen> Don't ask how you can "do" free software business; Stephen> ask what your business can "do for" free software. -- Adrian Aichner mailto:adrian＠xemacs.org http://www.xemacs.org/