Re: [comp.emacs.xemacs] Re: Are GNU- and XEmacs hoplessly forked?

Darryl> Adrian.Aichner(a)t-online.de (Adrian Aichner) wrote: Darryl> We do. I didn't mean to suggest otherwise. Darryl> RT(latest)FM, which, unfortunately, is only available Darryl> in CVS (the Darryl> online manual hasn't been updated for some months). Except for http://www.xemacs.org/Documentation/21.5/html/lispref_47.html#SEC670 Incidentally and independently I put out HTML docs for XEmacs yesterday. And I even started with the right version (21.5: beta). Darryl> The "Glyphs" chapter in the lispref manual now Darryl> contains examples on Darryl> how to use images. This part was added after Herr Great. Darryl> Kastrup's initial rant on the confusing "image support in Darryl> XEmacs", and is based upon a posting where I replied to Darryl> his complaints (WITH EXAMPLES). Unfortunately, he does Darryl> not seem to have read it (I only posted it in Darryl> comp.emacs.xemacs as a reply to his rants, and did not Darryl> email him a copy). I'll solicit David's feedback. Later, Adrian Darryl> -- Darryl> Darryl Okahata Darryl> darrylo(a)soco.agilent.com Darryl> DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not Darryl> constitute the support, opinion, or policy of Agilent Technologies, or Darryl> of the little green men that have been following him all day. -- Adrian Aichner mailto:adrian＠xemacs.org http://www.xemacs.org/