June 2011 - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

can't bind control-z in 21.5, but in 21.4 I can 13 years, 1 month

Uwe Brauer

Neither of the following binding (global-set-key [(control z)] 'suspend-emacs-or-iconify-frame) (global-set-key "\C-z" 'suspend-emacs-or-iconify-frame) works, Why? Uwe Brauer _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta

3 participants
2 comments

[Bug: xemacsweb] fresh checkout didn't build 13 years, 1 month

Mike Kupfer

================================================================ Dear Bug Team! I checked out and tried building xemacsweb, so that I can start submitting website patches. (The paths that it lists for CVS access are out-of-date, and I think I have one or two other issues in my to-do list somewhere.) The "make init" failed trying to run bin/genpage. "ls -l" shows its permissions as -rw-r-xr-x 1 kupfer kupfer 24146 Aug 3 2000 genpage Note that the user permissions do not have the execute bit set. Is there a problem in how the file is registered with CVS on the server? I hacked around it by changing genpage/Makefile to use "perl -w bin/genpage" instead of just "bin/genpage". But I guess that won't work on Windows...? uname -a: Linux assam 2.6.32-32-generic #62-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 20 21:54:21 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux Internationalization Settings: ------------------------- Environment: Value of LC_ALL : nil Value of LC_COLLATE : nil Value of LC_CTYPE : nil Value of LC_MESSAGES : nil Value of LC_MONETARY : nil Value of LC_NUMERIC : nil Value of LC_TIME : C Value of LANG : en_US.utf8 mike _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta

1 participants
0 comments

Summary of XEmacs Issue Tracking System Issues 13 years, 1 month

XEmacs Issue Tracking System

ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2011-06-07 - 2011-06-14) XEmacs Issue Tracking System at http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/ To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue number. Do NOT respond to this message. 524 open ( +3) / 249 closed ( +0) / 773 total ( +3) Open issues with patches: 12 Average duration of open issues: 875 days. Median duration of open issues: 927 days. Open Issues Breakdown new 189 ( +3) deferred 6 ( +0) napping 4 ( +0) verified 54 ( +0) assigned 151 ( +0) committed 28 ( +0) documented 3 ( +0) done/needs work 24 ( +0) Issues Created Or Reopened (3) ______________________________ Add a function to invoke customize-variable from hyper-apropos 2011-06-10 http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/issue773 created stephen Jul-2010 sumo has shadows 2011-06-11 http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/issue774 created mike.kupfer completion functions should take hash-tables as well as alists 2011-06-12 http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/issue775 created stephen _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta

1 participants
0 comments

Re: Help with GNU Emacs syntax.el and XEmacs buffer-syntactic-context et al? 13 years, 1 month

Stephen J. Turnbull

Andreas Röhler writes: > Here a diff of a doku's part: Thank you. But this doesn't mean we don't need tests and perhaps correspondence with the GNU folks. _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta

2 participants
6 comments

Re: Help with GNU Emacs syntax.el and XEmacs buffer-syntactic-context et al? 13 years, 1 month

The XEmacs Package Smoketest

>>>>> Stephen J Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes: > You just chose a bad place to start. Maybe there are no good places to start ;-) > Adding code in the area of syntax processing that nobody here > understands is shoving *somebody* into the lion's den. It is full > of both subtle semantics and performance pitfalls. Seems promising! > Adding tests isn't that hard. If you've not done it before, yes, it > will seem forbidding and (probably) underdocumented. But helping > people to add tests (and learn to do it themselves in the process) > is something I will always make time for. I've been playing with it a little so I think I can crawl. I guess the real problem is that I don't know what I should test and what the right response is! So if you have some good tests for parse-partial-sexp laying around... Without that I think I will make up some simple tests and go for a patch for getting views. Yours -- %% Mats _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta

2 participants
3 comments

Re: [Bug: 21.4.17] region too large (fundamental mode) 13 years, 1 month

Mike Kupfer

Pete Osler wrote: > The answer is: when I start up xemacs w/*-nw* option, I don't have the *region > too large* problem. So something wrong w/Xwindows? You wouldn't happen to > be an Xwindows expert, too? :-( Nope. Which is (one reason) why it's useful to keep the discussion on-list. ;-) I'm guessing this has something to do with setting the selection or clipboard larger than X can handle, but that's just a guess. You could try setting interprogram-cut-function to nil M-: (setq interprogram-cut-function nil) and see if that helps. Or maybe someone else on xemacs-beta (cc'd) has a better idea. mike _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta

2 participants
1 comments

[PATCH] copy delete-trailing-whitespace from Emacs 23. 13 years, 1 month

Jeff Sparkes

I copied the delete-trailing-whitespace from emacs23/lisp/simple.el. I wrote the documentation entry myself; it needs to be reviewed. I couldn't find a section on whitespace to reference, so I just said "spaces and tabs". Pedantically it removes the regexp \s-, skipping formfeeds. How much detail should I go into? diff --git a/lisp/simple.el b/lisp/simple.el --- a/lisp/simple.el +++ b/lisp/simple.el ＠＠ -329,6 +329,23 ＠＠ (insert ? )) (delete-region (point) (progn (skip-chars-forward " \t") (point)))) +(defun delete-trailing-whitespace () + "Delete all the trailing whitespace across the current buffer. +All whitespace after the last non-whitespace character in a line is deleted. +This respects narrowing, created by \\[narrow-to-region] and friends. +A formfeed is not considered whitespace by this function." + (interactive "*") + (save-match-data + (save-excursion + (goto-char (point-min)) + (while (re-search-forward "\\s-$" nil t) + (skip-syntax-backward "-" (save-excursion (forward-line 0) (point))) + ;; Don't delete formfeeds, even if they are considered whitespace. + (save-match-data + (if (looking-at ".*\f") + (goto-char (match-end 0)))) + (delete-region (point) (match-end 0)))))) + (defun delete-blank-lines () "On blank line, delete all surrounding blank lines, leaving just one. On isolated blank line, delete that one. diff --git a/man/xemacs/killing.texi b/man/xemacs/killing.texi --- a/man/xemacs/killing.texi +++ b/man/xemacs/killing.texi ＠＠ -99,6 +99,12 ＠＠ the next line by deleting a newline and all surrounding spaces, possibly leaving a single space. ＠xref{Indentation,M-^}. +＠findex delete-trailing-whitespace + ＠code{delete-trailing-whitespace} deletes spaces and tabs at the end +of all of the lines in the current buffer or region +(＠pxref{Narrowing}). This command does not remove formfeed +characters. + ＠subsection Killing by Lines ＠table ＠kbd _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta

5 participants
10 comments

Emacs compatible completing-read 13 years, 1 month

Raymond Toy

It seems that emacs allows the table argument to completing-read to be a hash-table (or other collection?). Any chance of updating xemacs' version to allow that too? Ray _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta

2 participants
1 comments

Re: byte-compiling within lexical-let 13 years, 1 month

Aidan Kehoe

Ar an deichiú lá de mí Meitheamh, scríobh Didier Verna: > Aidan Kehoe wrote: > > > But I suspect you’re looking for a more general solution in the > > context of implementing CLOS; we don’t have one at the moment. > > Yeah. For the time being, one solution for me would be to modify > cl-macroexpand-all in order to make it aware of defgeneric, defmethod > and defclass forms. OK, though I would be surprised if you can’t do it in those macros themselves. -- ‘Iodine deficiency was endemic in parts of the UK until, through what has been described as “an unplanned and accidental public health triumph”, iodine was added to cattle feed to improve milk production in the 1930s.’ (EN Pearce, Lancet, June 2011) _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta

1 participants
0 comments

Re: byte-compiling within lexical-let 13 years, 1 month

Aidan Kehoe

Ar an deichiú lá de mí Meitheamh, scríobh Stephen J. Turnbull: > Aidan Kehoe writes: > > > Were we to add lexical scope support to the byte code instructions > > and the byte compiler, this would be a natural part of that. > > How hard would that be, do you have any idea? The technically difficult bit is the design, and we have that already in Common Lisp. The actuallly difficult bit is the manpower. -- ‘Iodine deficiency was endemic in parts of the UK until, through what has been described as “an unplanned and accidental public health triumph”, iodine was added to cattle feed to improve milk production in the 1930s.’ (EN Pearce, Lancet, June 2011) _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta

1 participants
0 comments

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

XEmacs-Beta June 2011