March 2003 - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

[AC] Re: [S] Re: [CORE (21.5)] Package infrastructure overhaul. 21 years, 1 month

Steve Youngs

APPROVE COMMIT This is now in. -- |---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---| | XEmacs - It's not just an editor. | | It's a way of life. | |------------------------------------<youngs(a)xemacs.org>---|

1 participants
0 comments

[21.4] Band-aid for Cygwin 21 years, 1 month

Stephen J. Turnbull

Not for Prime Time. Proof of concept and a way to build for testers. But requires recently updated Cygwin, I believe (old Cygwin will not get intptr_t defined at all). I'll try to cons up a configure-based solution, but can't promise "immediately". $ cvs diff -u src/lisp.h Index: src/lisp.h =================================================================== RCS file: /pack/xemacscvs/XEmacs/xemacs/src/lisp.h,v retrieving revision 1.45.2.7 diff -u -r1.45.2.7 lisp.h --- src/lisp.h 2003/01/03 09:59:47 1.45.2.7 +++ src/lisp.h 2003/03/20 11:12:28 ＠＠ -2264,6 +2264,9 ＠＠ #ifdef HAVE_INTTYPES_H #include <inttypes.h> +#elif defined(__CYGWIN__) +/* Cygwin defines these types in <cygwin/types.h> + We can hope that if they ever get inttypes.h, they won't define twice */ #elif SIZEOF_VOID_P == SIZEOF_INT typedef int intptr_t; typedef unsigned int uintptr_t;

3 participants
3 comments

synopsis field<synopsis of the problem (one line)> 21 years, 1 month

GNU Bug Tracking System

>Submitter-Id: intranet.netvisor.hu >Originator: GNU Bug Tracking System >Organization: intranet.netvisor.hu >Confidential: >Synopsis: synopsis field >Severity: >Priority: >Category: pending >Class: >Release: gnats-3.101 >Environment: System: SunOS fire 5.8 Generic_108528-17 sun4u sparc SUNW,UltraAX-i2 Architecture: sun4 >Description: >How-To-Repeat: >Fix:

1 participants
0 comments

Re: Will Martin contribute to XEmacs in the future? 21 years, 1 month

Stephen J. Turnbull

>>>>> "mb" == Martin Buchholz <martin(a)xemacs.org> writes: mb> I am not convinced that packagizing the tests is a good idea. mb> It would discourage testing by users. It would still be available by make check. My basic plan (not approved or implemented yet) for source distribution is xemacs.tar.gz -> contains sumos. xemacs-src.tar.gz -> contains whatever is needed to bootstrap packages, regression tests, etc. CVS would need something, but probably a dodge like checking out the tests package as a submodule would work. I would not move the tests to packages until this is in place. mb> In general, unless disk space is an issue, tests should be mb> distributed with the sources that they test. In the above framework, tests would be available in the same distribution as the sources being tested. However, with packagization they would become a true regression test, and would also allow us (and users) to backtrack pre-existing bugs. (For example, every XEmacs released in the 21.5 series fails the same tests in regexp-tests.el that 21.4 does, as do 21.1.14 and 21.1.9. I think we can presume that 21.2.xx all do, too.) mb> The Linus model is not a gated community; I didn't mean to imply that the Linux kernel community was. However, our relative lack of resources is not likely to support a free- wheeling community like Linux's. mb> For XEmacs, the stable branch is run Linus-style by Vin, mb> fairly successfully. Vin has done a good job. But the stable branch is not where the code you worry about is introduced. -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.

2 participants
6 comments

21.5 Test Suite Failures 21 years, 1 month

Steve Youngs

Hi Folks! Recent discussion on this list about the test suite has prompted me to finally get around to trying to get something done about the 'make check' failures for 21.5. Any test in the test suite that doesn't pass 100% looks *BAD*. And makes people feel uneasy about using the software. Things like "Known Bug" are just as bad IMO, "Expected Failure" isn't that much better. My predecessor's predecessor had a "zero tolerance" policy in regard to test suite failures. Such a policy can only benefit the XEmacs project, there just isn't a down side. So I'll be adopting the same zero tolerance for test suite failures for XEmacs 21.5. Please consider this a general call for volunteers to help track down and fix the bugs that are causing the test failures. I'll post more specific details of each group of failures shortly. Many thanks from your XBRM to bug fixers all. -- |---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---| | XEmacs - It's not just an editor. | | It's a way of life. | |------------------------------------<youngs(a)xemacs.org>---|

1 participants
0 comments

Custom Innovative Programming 21 years, 1 month

Custom Innovative Programming

Dear Internet User, Availinnovations.net is one of the leading innovative software development companies presented online today. Once you need online ecommerce solution or graphic web design, IE Toolbar to get one click access to your website for your customers and visitors or custom programming please consider Avail Innovations as your software developer. http://www.availinnovations.net We develop for ALL WINDOWS AND UNIX PLATFORMS + free project estimation (find out the cost of your project in prices of Avail Innovations Software Development Company) Typical rate is as low as $20USD per hour. For more complete information about our company and services we provide please visit http://www.availinnovations.net I will be very glad to answer any of your questions (availm0114(a)mail.ru). Feel free to contact me any time and all cost and time estimations of your project will be done for you FREE of charge.

1 participants
0 comments

watch girls do everything 21 years, 1 month

julia223＠webmail2u.biz

Sorry, this message requires a HTML compliant email reader.

1 participants
0 comments

Are you going to look this time 21 years, 1 month

brittany＠webmail2u.biz

Sorry, this message requires a HTML compliant email reader.

1 participants
0 comments

xemacs-beta,�� 21 years, 1 month

Maria Mirza

1 participants
0 comments

http://www.gnu.org/directory/text/editors/ 21 years, 1 month

Giacomo Boffi

XEmacs is not mentioned under editors, probably because no one submitted a request to bug-directory(a)gnu.org

3 participants
3 comments

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

XEmacs-Beta March 2003