August 2000 - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

Re: configure changes (shared libs)? 24 years, 3 months

Dhruva_KRISHNAMURTHY＠delmia.com

Hi John, I am a not a Xemacs pro, so I am not too sure of the intricacies. I was able to build on IRIX 6.5 with out any problems. I just used the default compiler ( cc ) and set the compilation flags to "-n32 -o2 -mips3". Infact, this was the first machine I tried to install as I have been successful in installing most of the GNU tools. with regards, dhruva

1 participants
0 comments

xemacs Install problems 24 years, 3 months

Epstein, Evan

I built and installed xemacs on a sparc 60 running Solaris 8. As I understand it, the pre-built kit will install to /usr/local; I don't have permissions to write there so I have to build it to install it elsewhere. I did as the directions said and downloaded the source and the packages, untarred and unzipped them. The only difference is, I was not root and I did a ./configure --prefix=/dir where dir is one directory above where I was installing from. Then I did the make install Then I did a setenv EMACSPACKAGEPATH /the_path/where_the/packages/were/untarred When I run it I get Warning:Cannot convert string <key>Escape,_Key_Cancel to type VirtualBinding and other similar warnings when I run it . The tool bar looks all messed up, the syntax highlighting color does not work properly and many options like paren matching are missing. Do I need more packages or did I neglect t do something? Thanks -=-Evan Evan D. Epstein Sr. Software Engineer Baylight Networks Corvis Corporation 301-310-3031 eepstein(a)corvis.com

1 participants
0 comments

building and installing xemacs 24 years, 3 months

Charles G Waldman

1) The webmaster(a)xemacs.org is probably not the best address for forwarding this sort of question. You can use the xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org mailing list if you are using a beta version, or the xemacs(a)xemacs.org list if it's a released version. (In general, people ask a lot of questions on the beta list, some of which aren't strictly related to beta XEmacs versions only). 2) I'm the guy who built the last released binary kits of XEmacs for Sparc/Solaris, but that was built on a Solaris 6 machine. I did the build without root privileges, supplying --prefix=/some/scratch/dir and had no problem 3) You haven't told us what version of XEmacs you were trying to build. 4) "Dull grey screen" sounds like just the default grey background (?) You can customize this to your liking - there is lots of info on customization on the xemacs.org website. "Strange looking buttons" might mean you don't have the XPM libraries installed, or they weren't found during the ./configure. "Some unstable behavior" is pretty hard to say anything meaningful about ;-) 5) Have you read README.packages ? Some of your problems sound to me like you haven't installed the Lisp packages. 6) If all else fails, try to install from a prebuilt binary kit. The one I build on Solaris 6 works fine on Solaris 7; I don't have a Solaris 8 machine to try it on. If you felt like testing it out and giving us some feedback that would be great!

1 participants
0 comments

["Epstein, Evan" <EEpstein@NOVATELECOM.com>] building and installing xemacs 24 years, 3 months

Steve Youngs

I don't know the first thing about Solaris, wouldn't know it if I fell over it. Anybody here able to help this guy out? -- |---<Regards, Steve Youngs>-----------[GnuPG KeyID: EFD82ED2]---| | XEmacs - It's not just an editor... | | It's a way of life. | |----------------------------------<mailto:youngs＠xemacs.org>---|

1 participants
0 comments

RE: Minor problems w/gtk-xemacs build 24 years, 3 months

Michael Hill

>>>>> "bp" == William M Perry <wmperry(a)aventail.com> writes: bp> For some reason I've been flooded with emails about gtk-xemacs bp> over the last few days, and trying to fix all the piddly bp> little problems. Here is is, really. :) According to some traffic on debian-devel this week, some people have just discovered it on Freshmeat.

1 participants
0 comments

Re: Minor problems w/gtk-xemacs build 24 years, 3 months

William M. Perry

"Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> writes: > >>>>> "-BP" == William M Perry <wmperry(a)aventail.com> writes: > > Hm, it is now on all the things I can think of (File | Open, Options | > Manage Packages). I'm not sure where it was, but I definitely saw the > old "list in a buffer in a frame" format file selection. There was a bug where if you hit cancel from the GTK filesel it would throw you into the old-style selector. This is fixed, but I cannot get to the CVS server. :( Waiting for someone in seattle to reboot it. > I'll try to be a little more observant in the future, but right now I'm > doing the work I was avoiding when I was playing with gtk-xemacs. Urk - work sucks. :) WORK STOPPAGE! JOIN ME IN THE GLORIOUS REVOLUTION BROTHERS! Uhhh, or get back to work. Whatever. :) -bp

1 participants
0 comments

Re: Minor problems w/gtk-xemacs build 24 years, 3 months

William M. Perry

"Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> writes: > >>>>> "-BP" == William M Perry <wmperry(a)aventail.com> writes: > > >> I do assume it exists ;-) > > -BP> #!＠%#! - attached. > > Urk ... not. Maybe you should get some sleep? ;-) For some reason I've been flooded with emails about gtk-xemacs over the last few days, and trying to fix all the piddly little problems. Here is is, really. :) -Bill P.

1 participants
0 comments

Re: gtk-xemacs resource question 24 years, 3 months

William M. Perry

"Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> writes: > >>>>> "giacomo" == giacomo boffi <giacomo.boffi(a)polimi.it> writes: > > giacomo> of course they are, you're in gtk-land! now you have > giacomo> those .gtkrc things, whose syntax is documented in the > giacomo> sources of gtk, as well as most of gtk itself... ;-) > > www.gnome.org and www.gtk.org have suffered a vast facelift recently. > (Within the last couple of months.) You'll be pleasantly surprised. > > A dedicated GNOME-detractor will still be able to find plenty of > faults in the docs, but it's no longer honest to say they aren't > giving it the old college try. But have you actually read the code? Bork! GTK is pretty well behaved in terms of sticking to the object system, but GNOME is horrid and requires direct structure access all over the place. *sigh* -Bill P.

2 participants
1 comments

Re: Minor problems w/gtk-xemacs build 24 years, 3 months

William M. Perry

"Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> writes: > >>>>> "-BP" == William M Perry <wmperry(a)aventail.com> writes: > > -BP> Loading up .../src/gtk-xemacs/tests/gtk/gtk-test.el and using > -BP> M-x gtk-test is a pretty good demo. > > Except for the lack of gtk-extra-test.el, which I can't get from libre at > the moment.... I do assume it exists ;-) %#!＠%#! - attached. I sent martin my SSH keys (lost the ones on xemacs.org a while ago :( ), and I plan to put this on a branch in CVS as soon as I can. > Commenting that load out ... whee, haven't seen XEmacs crash so > spectacularly in a long time! > > That stuff is pretty impressive. It's too bad it doesn't happen > automatically (eg, for file selections). _That_ would be noticable in > ordinary usage. It should be using the normal GTK file selector now... is it not showing up for you? > For your amusement, the console messages. None of the assertions caused > the crash, it was the "convert: " failure to find a pixmap that did it, > leaving behind an impressive but totally non-functional dialog suggesting > that I visit some GNOME page. > > Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkstyle.c: line 523 (gtk_style_attach): assertion `window != NULL' failed. > > Gdk-CRITICAL **: file gdkwindow.c: line 716 (gdk_window_ref): assertion `window != NULL' failed. > > Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkstyle.c: line 523 (gtk_style_attach): assertion `window != NULL' failed. > > Gdk-CRITICAL **: file gdkwindow.c: line 716 (gdk_window_ref): assertion `window != NULL' failed. > > Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkstyle.c: line 523 (gtk_style_attach): assertion `window != NULL' failed. > > Gdk-CRITICAL **: file gdkwindow.c: line 1233 (gdk_window_set_background): assertion `window != NULL' failed. > convert: Not a PNM image file (/usr/share/pixmaps/). > convert: Missing an image file name. > convert: Not a PNM image file (/usr/share/pixmaps/). > convert: Missing an image file name. > gdk_imlib ERROR: Cannot load image: /usr/share/pixmaps/ Is your XEmacs linked with gnome, or was it dynamically loaded? -bp

2 participants
1 comments

Re: Minor problems w/gtk-xemacs build 24 years, 3 months

William M. Perry

"Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> writes: > >>>>> "-BP" == William M Perry <wmperry(a)aventail.com> writes: > > -BP> nbecker(a)fred.net writes: > >> Uhhh... what patch? > > -BP> ＠#!%!＠#%!＠%#!... this one. > > No, not that one. Too many .texis :-) Fine, be picky. :) > libre is being decidedly unfriendly again today. :-( I think the poor thing got swamped with network traffic. It is just a little Sparc IPX running linux... pity it. :( > BTW, is there a spectacular demo of gtk-xemacs? I'm very impressed that > the bear dances, but gtk-xemacs (as I normally use emacs) doesn't quite > match Baryshnikov. (I have long hated the detachable toolbars, so maybe > I'm just prejudiced.) You'll be glad to know that the toolbars are not detachable, mainly because the current XEmacs toolbar code is a little too toolkit unfriendly and assumes that nobody uses a geometry manager. > It doesn't have to be a Lisp program or other run-time thing, some > neat configuration option would be great. Loading up .../src/gtk-xemacs/tests/gtk/gtk-test.el and using M-x gtk-test is a pretty good demo. If you have gnome installed you can also futz around with changing the themes dynamically from theme-selector-capplet. Cheesy, but kind of cool. The killer app will be when/if someone writes a customize interface in real GTK. Kind of like the sawfish UI stuff. Wouldn't be terribly difficult. -Bill P.

2 participants
2 comments

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

XEmacs-Beta August 2000