"Kirill 'Big K' Katsnelson" <kkm(a)dtmx.com> writes:
> (setq debug-om-signal t)
> C-h C-f
>
> Signaling: (error "Unbalanced parentheses")
Isn't this simply a case of "Don't do that then"?
> The signal is caught somewhere, so the function finally works. Anyway,
> can somebody who knows it better than me look at the code?
IIRTTCC, the signal is caught by the ignore-errors statement in
function-at-point, which is as it should be.
Jan