August 1999 - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

RE: 21.2-b19: hang under Solaris 2.5.1 24 years, 9 months

Andy Piper

At 09:24 AM 8/4/99 -0700, Damon Lipparelli wrote: >I was wondering & thinking the same things. Any investigation you want me >to try? Yes, but what - I have no idea :) Is it you using X11R5? If so can you try commenting out the handle_focus_1 changes I put in for widgets to see if that fixes anything? Thanks andy -------------------------------------------------------------- Dr Andy Piper Senior Consultant Architect, BEA Systems Ltd

1 participants
0 comments

Re: gutter fixes 24 years, 9 months

Adrian Aichner

>>>>> "Andy" == Andy Piper <andy(a)xemacs.org> writes: Andy> I think this fixes everything I can reproduce. I will apply Andy> this to cvs. andy I updated from CVS at Compilation started at Wed Aug 04 16:41:33 1999 +0200 After building tabs are back. The housekeeping of buffer-tabs is still broken however: After starting XEmacs it has only one tab for "*scratch*". I type C-x C-b (list-buffers) which gives me "*Buffer List*" in the lower window. No new tab for that buffer is created until I M-: (update-tab-in-gutter) or switch around between buffers. Adrian

2 participants
2 comments

Re: XEmacs 21.1.3 binary-kits are available 24 years, 9 months

Jason R Mastaler

Darryl Okahata <darrylo(a)sr.hp.com> writes: > Yes, like FreshMeat. If you're busy, I could submit an entry to > FreshMeat. You can do this if you want, but since FreshMeat is so Linux-oriented, you should probably wait a few more days first. The Linux binary-kits are still trickling in.

2 participants
1 comments

RE: 21.2-b19: hang under Solaris 2.5.1 24 years, 9 months

Damon Lipparelli

I was wondering & thinking the same things. Any investigation you want me to try? -lipp -----Original Message----- From: Andy Piper [mailto:andy＠xemacs.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 1999 2:53 AM To: Damon Lipparelli; 'xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org' Subject: Re: 21.2-b19: hang under Solaris 2.5.1 Why is it trying to get Xt events in batch mode? I suspect I may be the culprit but I don't understand why. andy At 12:11 PM 8/2/99 -0700, Damon Lipparelli wrote: >Building from a brand new CVS tree plus the attached patches from the >mailing list, with up-to-date packages, the build hangs exec'ing this >command: > >Compiling files without .elc... >/users/lipp/src/xemacs-beta/xemacs-21.2/src/xemacs -batch -vanilla -f >batch-byte-compile lisp/./about.el lisp/./alist.el lisp/./apropos.el >lisp/./autoload.el lisp/./blessmail.el lisp/./build-report.el >lisp/./callers-of-rpt.el lisp/./check-features.el lisp/./cl-compat.el >lisp/./cleantree.el lisp/./config.el lisp/./cus-dep.el lisp/./cus-edit.el >lisp/./cus-face.el lisp/./cus-load.el lisp/./custom-load.el lisp/./disass.el >lisp/./disp-table.el lisp/./etags.el lisp/./files-nomule.el > >Attaching to the XEmacs process gives the stack trace in "hang.txt". > > <<ins-21.2-b19-nodebug.txt>> <<21.2-b20-patch1.txt>> ><<21.2-b20-patch2.txt>> <<hang.txt>> > >Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\ins-21.2-b19-nodebug.txt" > >Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\21.2-b20-patch1.txt" > >Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\21.2-b20-patch2.txt" > >Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\hang.txt" > -------------------------------------------------------------- Dr Andy Piper Senior Consultant Architect, BEA Systems Ltd

1 participants
0 comments

Re: XEmacs 21.1.3 binary-kits are available 24 years, 9 months

Jason R Mastaler

wmperry(a)aventail.com (William M. Perry) writes: > and don't forget comp.emacs.xemacs, comp.editors, etc. I don't plan to do this (thats what the xemacs-announce mailing list is for afterall), but if someone would like to forward my announcement to these newsgroups I wouldn't mind. The announcement is also available online at: <http://www.xemacs.org/list-archives/xemacs-announce/9907/msg00004.html>

2 participants
1 comments

Re: package manager misuses pgp5, and fails with pgp2.6.2, too 24 years, 9 months

Karl Kleinpaste

SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org> writes: > It depends upon which version of the package-index file you are using. Offhand, I didn't even know what package-index was in question. I already had the July 29 sumo tarballs installed, and was just toying with the package manager when I ran into this bug. As it happens, I just now manually acquired the latest mailcrypt-2.02 package and installed it...and now when I run the exact same sequence in an "xemacs -q", it claims that entries are not signed at all. This is notwithstanding the fact that I now have a package-index.LATEST.pgp with modtime of just moments ago, plus the prev. version as package-index.LATEST.pgp~, with modtime July 29 21:50. ??? > You can either strip out the signature, or update to the most recent > package-index file on the FTP site (which includes a pointer to an > updated version of the mailcrypt package). As I said, I already got that later mailcrypt. But I have no idea how or why any of this has occurred. Installing the latest mailcrypt shouldn't have affected the determination of *whether* the packages are PGP-signed. In fact, now, after starting up the package manager (and telling it to continue even though entries are not signed), the mailcrypt library is not even loaded -- the variable mc-version is not known. I am *so* confused.

1 participants
0 comments

Re: [OK] 21.2 (beta19) "Shinjuku" XEmacs Lucid on i586-pc-linux 24 years, 9 months

Adrian Aichner

>>>>> "Larry" == Larry Ayers <layers(a)marktwain.net> writes: Larry> Built from patched source, runs fine. I noticed that the Larry> gutter patches have been applied, and that there is a new Larry> menu-item (Options->Gutter Appearance). There is no Larry> visible gutter, though. Shouldn't there be? I see the same in (emacs-version) "XEmacs 21.2 (beta19) \"Shinjuku\" [Lucid] (i586-pc-win32) of Fri Jul 30 1999 on ZJ75T" built from CVS sources as of "Sun Aug 01 8:00:03 1999" UTC. Even toggling Options->Gutter Appearance doesn't get me any buffer tabs. Adrian

2 participants
2 comments

[BUG] 21.2.19+ --with-widget configure problems, /usr/dt is poison 24 years, 9 months

SL Baur

Configuring with --with-widgets=athena3d results in no widgets. Configuring with --with-widgets=lucid results in Motif widgets being selected. I suggest this code be looked at a little more closely: case "$with_widgets" in "" | "yes" | "lucid") if test "$have_motif" = "yes"; then with_widgets="motif" elif test "$have_xaw" = "yes"; then with_widgets="athena" else with_widgets=no fi ;; esac When I tried to build with the attached configuration I got: gcc -c -g -O3 -I. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/lib/locale/ja/wnn/demo/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/canna/include -I/usr/dt/include -I/usr/local/X11R6/include /usr/local/devel/xemacs-21.2/lwlib/lwlib-Xm.c /usr/local/devel/xemacs-21.2/lwlib/lwlib-Xm.c: In function `xm_destroy_instance': /usr/local/devel/xemacs-21.2/lwlib/lwlib-Xm.c:1764: `mark_dead_instance_destroyed' undeclared (first use in this function) /usr/local/devel/xemacs-21.2/lwlib/lwlib-Xm.c:1764: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once /usr/local/devel/xemacs-21.2/lwlib/lwlib-Xm.c:1764: for each function it appears in.) /usr/local/devel/xemacs-21.2/lwlib/lwlib-Xm.c:1771: `xm_nosel_callback' undeclared (first use in this function) make[1]: *** [lwlib-Xm.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/devel/miho-test/lwlib' make: *** [lwlib] Error 2 I am building against X11R6.3 (XFree86 libraries) and Solaris Motif is poison in that environment. So is /usr/dt, but for whatever reason the unconditional insertion of it has not been fixed. uname -a: SunOS miho 5.6 Generic_105181-05 sun4u sparc ../xemacs-21.2/configure '--with-mule' '--debug=no' '--error-checking=none' '--extra-verbose=no' '--site-prefixes=/usr/local' '--x-includes=/usr/local/X11R6/include' '--x-libraries=/usr/local/X11R6/lib' '--compiler=gcc' '--mail-locking=file' '--srcdir=../xemacs-21.2' '--cflags=-g -O3' '--with-xim=xlib' '--site-includes=/usr/lib/locale/ja/wnn/demo/include' '--site-libraries=/usr/lib/locale/ja/wnn/lib' '--with-cde=no' '--with-tooltalk=no' '--with-scrollbars=athena3d' '--with-dialogs=athena3d' '--without-menubars' '--with-widgets=lucid' XEmacs 21.2-b19 "Shinjuku" configured for `sparc-sun-solaris2.6'. Where should the build process find the source code? /usr/local/devel/xemacs-21.2 What installation prefix should install use? /usr/local What operating system and machine description files should XEmacs use? `s/sol2.h' and `m/sparc.h' What compiler should XEmacs be built with? gcc -g -O3 Should XEmacs use the GNU version of malloc? yes Should XEmacs use the relocating allocator for buffers? yes What window system should XEmacs use? x11 Where do we find X Windows header files? /usr/dt/include /usr/local/X11R6/include Where do we find X Windows libraries? /usr/dt/lib /usr/local/X11R6/lib Additional header files: /usr/lib/locale/ja/wnn/demo/include Additional libraries: /usr/lib/locale/ja/wnn/lib Additional prefixes: /usr/local Runtime library search path: /usr/lib/locale/ja/wnn/lib:/usr/local/lib:/usr/dt/lib:/usr/local/X11R6/lib Compiling in support for XAUTH. Compiling in support for XPM images. Compiling in support for PNG image handling. Compiling in support for (builtin) GIF image handling. Compiling in support for JPEG image handling. Compiling in support for TIFF image handling. Compiling in support for X-Face message headers. Compiling in support for GNU DBM. Compiling in support for ncurses. Compiling in Mule (multi-lingual) support. Compiling in XIM (X11R5+ I18N input method) support. Using raw Xlib to provide XIM support. Compiling in support for Canna on Mule. Compiling in support for the WNN input method on Mule. Using WNN version 6. Compiling in support for proper WM_COMMAND handling. Using Athena-3d scrollbars. Using Motif native widgets. Using Athena-3d dialog boxes. Compiling in DSO module support. movemail will use "dot-locking" for locking mail spool files.

2 participants
2 comments

customize/gutter breakage 24 years, 9 months

Neal D. Becker

I tried to use customize/gutter to turn off the gutter. When I tried to set for current session, I got this error: Use `set-specifier' to change a specifier's value: bottom-gutter-visible-p

2 participants
1 comments

[Patch] XEmacs 21.2.19 Makefile.in.in 24 years, 9 months

Marcus Thiessel

Can we apply this cosmetic patch. Otherwise I always get errors on unknown preprocessing directives. --Marcus --- Makefile.in.in.orig Wed Aug 4 13:42:18 1999 +++ Makefile.in.in Wed Aug 4 13:30:13 1999 ＠＠ -199,7 +199,7 ＠＠ ## currently being edited. lockdir=＠lockdir＠ -# Where to put the DOC file. +## Where to put the DOC file. docdir=＠docdir＠ ## Where to put executables to be run by XEmacs rather than

1 participants
0 comments

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

XEmacs-Beta August 1999