cvs access for XEmacs 21.2.*
24 years, 12 months
Petr Konecny
Petr Konecny
Hi,
are the 21.2 releases of XEmacs available through cvs ?
The announcements indicate they are. I was able to get only 21.0.67
though.
Thanks, Petr
- 1 participants
- 0 comments
Re: mingw32 port
24 years, 12 months
Jan Vroonhof
Jan Vroonhof
Andy Piper <andy(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> This ports 21.2 to mingw32. I will apply this patch
This means that it is now possibly to compile a native Win32 XEmacs
with a free compiler, doesn't it?
--
Jan Vroonhof http://www.math.ethz.ch/~vroonhof/
Mathematik, vroonhof ＠ math.ethz.ch
HG E16, ETH-Zentrum, Tel: +41-1-6325456/25154
Raemistrasse 101, CH-8092 Zuerich. Fax: +41-1-6321085
- 2 participants
- 1 comments
pc-select in XEmacs-21.2b13
24 years, 12 months
Mike McMahon
Mike McMahon
pc-select-map shadows the work of init-post-mswindows-win for (shift
delete), (shift insert), and (control insert) with the older, x- names.
This is okay for x-kill-primary-selection and x-copy-primary-selection,
which are just obsolete aliases.
But yank-clipboard-selection now only does x-yank-clipboard-selection in
the x device-type case. On NT4, one gets an undefined function.
Unless I'm missing something, it's just a matter of removing the x-'s from
these three top-level bindings in pc-select.el.
- 1 participants
- 0 comments
Re: package dependencies
24 years, 12 months
Jan Vroonhof
Jan Vroonhof
Mauro Condarelli <mcondarelli(a)soft-in.com> writes:
> > Yes, this is currently the biggest problem.
> IMHO the real problem is there's still a lot of work to othogonalize
> the packages.
They can never be fully orthogonal. We need run time dependencies at
some point. We also need to learn the package-get code about other
package sources.
> FYI: the error went away closing the session and restarting, so I
> assume that installing a package (mail-lib) in a running xemacs is
> somewhat different from having it available at startup (problems with
> auto-autoloads??).
Yes. It is an auto-autoloads problem. These things are _very_ hard to
fix_ when you want to do runtime installation of packages.
> # ./configure --with-mule --prefix=/opt/xemacs --compiler=egcc --error-checking=none --debug=no --gung-ho
>
> shouldn't that cure all beta-lowness?
Yes.
Jan
P.S. You do not want to give lazy-lock a spin. I was asking because
the XEmacs version of it is very suboptimal and can lead to the kind
of weird behaviour you mentioned.
- 1 participants
- 0 comments