April 1999 - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

Re: XEmacs and its multiuser roots (was Re: change \C-m binding to newline-and-indent) 25 years, 1 month

SL Baur

Holger Schauer <schauer(a)coling.uni-freiburg.de> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org: >>>>> "sb" == SL Baur schrieb am 06 Apr 1999 03:59:30 -0700: ... sb> The XEmacs user base has changed dramatically over the last three sb> years in favor of systems that are typically single-user. > How do you know ? Justin Sheehy <justin(a)linus.mitre.org> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org: > SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org> writes: >> The XEmacs user base has changed dramatically over the last three >> years in favor of systems that are typically single-user. > How can you tell? One xemacs install on a UNIX-like OS may be used by > hundreds of users, as at my current site. One xemacs install on a > windows OS will, I'd bet, almost certainly be used by a single person. > Thus, you can't tell from number of downloads. Two things, one of which you've already discounted. Since late 1996, the most popular binary kits downloaded from ftp.xemacs.og have been for Linux. The second is based on the number of Linux CD ROM distributions XEmacs appears on. Admittedly, I also have no hard numbers on how many people have installed XEmacs off of Linux CD ROMs.

1 participants
0 comments

Re: XEmacs and its multiuser roots (was Re: change \C-m binding to newline-and-indent) 25 years, 1 month

Justin Sheehy

SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org> writes: > The XEmacs user base has changed dramatically over the last three > years in favor of systems that are typically single-user. How can you tell? One xemacs install on a UNIX-like OS may be used by hundreds of users, as at my current site. One xemacs install on a windows OS will, I'd bet, almost certainly be used by a single person. Thus, you can't tell from number of downloads. So, I'm really curious... What makes you make that statement about the shift in user base? > I've never used XEmacs (or GNU Emacs) in a multiuser environment by > the way -- twelve years and counting ... As a contrary data point, almost all of the several environments that I've used some form of emacs in have been multiuser. -Justin

1 participants
0 comments

Re: strange insertion in the mail headers 25 years, 1 month

Jan Vroonhof

Colin Rafferty <craffert(a)ms.com> writes: > by frege.math.ethz.ch (8.9.1/8.9.1) id UAA17091 > by gwyn.tux.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) id OAA24227 > for xemacs-beta-out; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 14:25:07 -0400 > by gwyn.tux.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA24218 > for <xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org>; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 14:25:02 -0400 Note. All Sendmail 8.9.1. It is very unlikely that is the problem. > X-Mailing-List: <xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org> > Hello Didier, this should be in the header. Bingo.... I just sent myself a local message (using our 8.9.1) and it doesn't do that. I suspect that whatever adds that X-Mailing-List header at xemacs.org does so incorrectly (forgets to insert a CRLF, thus munging the CRLFCRLF sequence that terminates the header ?) Jan

1 participants
0 comments

Re: strange insertion in the mail headers 25 years, 1 month

Tor Arntsen

On Apr 6, 20:07, Colin Rafferty wrote: >User-Agent: Gnus/5.07008 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.80) XEmacs/21.0(beta67) (20 minutes to Nikko) >Sender: owner-xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org >X-Mailing-List: <xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org> > Hello Didier, this should be in the header. It did end up in the heaader.. it should have been a blank line in between there, right? - Tor

1 participants
0 comments

Re: Behaviour of call-process 25 years, 1 month

Jan Vroonhof

Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz(a)wirtschaft.tu-chemnitz.de> writes: > > Is this a documented behaviour or just a bug? It is a bug. Probably some weird configure failure or glibc 2.1 changed the signal semantics again. Does config.h look reasonable? (At first I thought it might be the new vfork() stuff in the 2.2 kernels but Fcall_process_internal uses a normal fork.) Jan

1 participants
0 comments

Re: strange insertion in the mail headers 25 years, 1 month

Colin Rafferty

Didier Verna writes: > I received 2 different mails from David Funk <david(a)jna.com.au> with > some strange stuff in the headers field as displayed by Gnus. > Didn't we have a similar problem a while ago ? I think David's MTA is more > likely to mess up with the message and add this piece of text by itself. I think that the problem is with the xemacs.org MTA. When the very first line of the message is indented, then xemacs.org thinks it is a continuation of the last header. I have put a line at the beginning of my message that should be mashed into the headers. Or not. This is an experiment. So while David's mailer creates ugly MIME (as opposed to Lars' pretty MIME), I don't think that its screwing up the headers. -- Colin

1 participants
0 comments

Re: Canna is hosed wrt Backspace and Delete keysyms 25 years, 1 month

SL Baur

Glynn Clements <glynn(a)sensei.co.uk> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org: ... > I don't have canna here, but I would expect the following to provide > the previous behaviour (but without affecting other packages): ... This isn't quite right, but it's close enough that I think I found a usable fix. Patch posted to xemacs-patches and xemacs-mule, thanks.

1 participants
0 comments

Re: Behaviour of call-process 25 years, 1 month

Didier Verna

Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz(a)wirtschaft.tu-chemnitz.de> writes: > at my system (i686-linux-gnu, glibc2.1, kernel 2.2.5) call-process is > not interruptable by "C-g" anymore. I can't reproduce it on SunOS metheny 5.5 Generic_103093-25 sun4u sparc -- / / _ _ Didier Verna http://www.inf.enst.fr/~verna/ - / / - / / /_/ / E.N.S.T. INF C201.1 mailto:verna＠inf.enst.fr /_/ / /_/ / /__ / 46 rue Barrault Tel. (33) 01 45 81 73 46 75634 Paris cedex 13 Fax. (33) 01 45 81 31 19

2 participants
1 comments

Re: Crash in XEmacs 21.0 "20 minutes to Nikko" with gnuserv/gnuclient 25 years, 1 month

Jan Vroonhof

obscurity <obscurity(a)obscure.org> writes: Do you have a real name by chance? I tend to interact better with real people. > I've got an easily-reproduceable crash in XEmacs 21.0 "20 minutes to Nikko", > when using gnuserv/gnuclient. If I start xemacs, run gnuserv-start, flip to > another virtual console (this is on linux) run gnuclient, and then exit > gnuclient (with or without doing any actual editing), then xemacs on the > original virtual console barfs, with the following : For me I get a crash on exit when on 21.2. > |#5 0x80ac5a7 in assert_failed (file=0x8204e49 "event-Xt.c", line=1863, > | expr=0x8204fd8 "closure") at emacs.c:2608 > |#6 0x818c960 in emacs_Xt_unselect_console (con=0x841df10) at event-Xt.c:1863 > |#7 0x80dd0ec in event_stream_unselect_console (con=0x841df10) Are you using GPM? Could you try without it. I think closing the gnuclient frame closes the GPM connection (or "unselects" it). However comments in "select_console" imply there is only _one_ connection. Not one per console. So it should not be unselected as long as there are still "linux console" consoles open. Jan P.S. Aren't all the linux consoles really one console in the XEmacs sense anyway?

2 participants
1 comments

strange insertion in the mail headers 25 years, 1 month

Didier Verna

I received 2 different mails from David Funk <david(a)jna.com.au> with some strange stuff in the headers field as displayed by Gnus. Here's the interesting part (which fucks up my nnmail-split-fancy settings): | Subject: Re: Problem with fonts under NT | In-Reply-To: <3704E713.41A17482(a)tardis.ed.ac.uk> | X-Gnus-Mail-Source: file:/var/mail/verna | Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9904051444270.16285-102000(a)janis.jna.com.au> | MIME-Version: 1.0 | Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1384043991-923287964=:16285" | Sender: owner-xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org | Precedence: bulk | X-Mailing-List: <xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org> | This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, | while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. | Send mail to mime(a)docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. | Xref: metheny.enst.fr mime:2 | Lines: 806 As you can see, there's some text under the X-Mailing-List field. Didn't we have a similar problem a while ago ? I think David's MTA is more likely to mess up with the message and add this piece of text by itself. David, could you investigate on this ? -- / / _ _ Didier Verna http://www.inf.enst.fr/~verna/ - / / - / / /_/ / E.N.S.T. INF C201.1 mailto:verna＠inf.enst.fr /_/ / /_/ / /__ / 46 rue Barrault Tel. (33) 01 45 81 73 46 75634 Paris cedex 13 Fax. (33) 01 45 81 31 19

1 participants
0 comments

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

XEmacs-Beta April 1999