November 1999 - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

Ben Wing

I've compiled a short list of bugs that I consider to be showstoppers for the 21.0 release. It's located at: http://devel.xemacs.org/xemacs/showstoppers.html Ben (typed by Martin)

6 participants
6 comments

Re: gud.el broken or is it just me? 22 years, 11 months

SL Baur

Aki Vehtari <Aki.Vehtari(a)hut.fi> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org: ... > Btw. gud.el in XEmacs is dated 1993 and gud.el in emacs-20.3 is > dated 1998. Unfortunately gud.el in emacs-20.3 does not work in > XEmacs and I don't know much work it would need to make it work and I've done the initial port of gud.el to XEmacs. It mostly works[1], but it sorely lacks the functionality in gdbsrc.el. Making a gudsrc.el mode is on my list of things to do. It was in ftp://altair.xemacs.org/pub/xemacs-futures/ when I was on the 'net. It was delayed integration into the XEmacs packages pending 21.0 release. I also have a ported cua-mode.el to integrate. NOTE: The gud.el and cua-mode.el XEmacs portings are courtesy of Altrasoft, Inc. Thank you Altrasoft. Footnotes: [1] I have a report that my port does not work on Solaris with dbx.

2 participants
1 comments

RoboCup 23 years, 2 months

Akram Khodadadi

Hello Please answer my question. We maked a player in Linux with Lisp languaege ,but we dont know how to make a UDP connection between our player and the server with Lisp languaege. We looked in many sources ,but we didn't attain any affects. Please say to us for making a UDP connection and geting and sending messages with that Lisp languaege which orders . Please explan with an example. Thanks Mrs Khodadadi

3 participants
2 comments

Problems with 'Buffers' tab. 24 years, 1 month

Nick V. Pakoulin

This bug report will be sent to the XEmacs Development Team, not to your local site managers!! Please write in English, because the XEmacs maintainers do not have translators to read other languages for them. In XEmacs 21.2 (beta22) "Mercedes" [Lucid] (i686-pc-linux) of Tue Nov 30 1999 on pegas.kazbek.ispras.ru configured using `configure --with-pop' Please describe exactly what actions triggered the bug and the precise symptoms of the bug: My settings: (custom-set-variables '(gutter-visible-p t) '(default-gutter-position (quote left)) '(buffers-tab-max-size 2)) 1. With this settings xemacs opens scratch buffer with "*scratch*" tab over the first line of the text. With the first cursor movement the tab disappears, but the text beneath is still invisible. Of course, it is not forever hidden, and there are more than one way to unhide it, but still ... 2. After changing default-gutter-position(via custom) from 'left to 'top or 'bottom, ugly blue(on my HP-400 workstation) regions are left in the current buffer window. These regiona are about 4 chars wide and attached to the left margin. Recent keystrokes: misc-user Recent messages (most recent first): Parsing /home/npakoulin/.mailrc... Loading mail-abbrevs...done Loading mail-abbrevs... Loading emacsbug...done Loading emacsbug... Loading /home/npakoulin/.e/.xemacs-init...done Loading ~/.abbrev_defs...done Loading ~/.abbrev_defs... Loading time...done Loading time...

2 participants
2 comments

XEmacs 21.2.19 crash 24 years, 3 months

Stef Epardaud

as of CVS some days ago: uname -a: Linux labyrinth 2.2.5 #1 Tue Oct 12 17:50:33 CEST 1999 i686 unknown ./configure '--with-mule' '--with-widgets=athena3d' '--with-dialogs=athena3d' XEmacs 21.2-b19 "Shinjuku" configured for `i686-pc-linux'. Where should the build process find the source code? /opt/src/xemacs What installation prefix should install use? /usr/local What operating system and machine description files should XEmacs use? `s/linux.h' and `m/intel386.h' What compiler should XEmacs be built with? gcc -g -O3 -Wall -Wno-switch Should XEmacs use the GNU version of malloc? yes (Using Doug Lea's new malloc from the GNU C Library.) Should XEmacs use the relocating allocator for buffers? yes What window system should XEmacs use? x11 Where do we find X Windows header files? /usr/X11R6/include Where do we find X Windows libraries? /usr/X11R6/lib Compiling in support for XAUTH. Compiling in support for XPM images. Compiling in support for PNG image handling. Compiling in support for (builtin) GIF image handling. Compiling in support for JPEG image handling. Compiling in support for TIFF image handling. Compiling in native sound support. Compiling in support for Berkeley DB. Compiling in support for ncurses. Compiling in Mule (multi-lingual) support. Compiling in XIM (X11R5+ I18N input method) support. Using raw Xlib to provide XIM support. Compiling in support for proper WM_COMMAND handling. Using Lucid menubars. Using Lucid scrollbars. Using Athena-3d native widgets. Using Athena-3d dialog boxes. Compiling in DSO module support. movemail will use "dot-locking" for locking mail spool files. Compiling in extra code for debugging. WARNING: --------------------------------------------------------- WARNING: Compiling in support for runtime error checking. WARNING: XEmacs will run noticeably more slowly as a result. WARNING: Error checking is on by default for XEmacs beta releases. WARNING: --------------------------------------------------------- Lisp backtrace follows: # (condition-case ... . error) # (catch top-level ...) -------- mmmm.... not much, and i do not have a core because it was not enabled. i have NO clue why it crashed or when or what it was doing. i was just focusing it back for the thousandth time with my autoraise mouse on X. i will cvs update and try to run it with core enabled and see what happens. -- # Stef Epardaud, # There is no limit to the power of computing ... # Java Defeater # ... except men maybe ? # Rotterdam # Lunatech Research, # NETHERLANDS # soon we will drop the searching for the finding... # #

2 participants
2 comments

Tabs' name strings are not font-switched with the rest of XEmacs 24 years, 3 months

Karl Kleinpaste

I have a small function which toggles the default font between the normal font and "nil2", which lets me conveniently put aside an XEmacs that's not currently interesting. Unfortunately, while XEmacs as a whole reacts to this by smallifying as the text reduces to the "nil2" font, the font used in the tabs continues to be original size.

2 participants
2 comments

fill-region-as-paragraph / mule / pdump / please help 24 years, 3 months

Olivier Galibert

I'm stumped. fill-region-as-paragraph works perfectly (afaik) when not using pdump or not using mule. Only pdump+mule is broken. While I can mostly follow the lisp code when featurep 'mule returns nil, I'm overweirded when the kinsoku junk comes into play. Could someone more knowledgeable about lisp point me to the subr/variable/whatever that does not behave the way it should so that I can trace the problem at the C level? OG.

3 participants
3 comments

zero size widget crashes continue 24 years, 3 months

Michael Harnois

This is not critical to me, since I kept a working copy of an older 21.2 beta to actually use ... but I haven't been able to use a current CVS beta for at least a month because, in gnus, they crash after no more than ten minutes with errors like these: xemacs: X Error of failed request: BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation) Major opcode of failed request: 12 (X_ConfigureWindow) Value in failed request: 0x0 Serial number of failed request: 79626 Current serial number in output stream: 79659 Error: Widget *Article* has zero width and/or height -- Michael D. Harnois, Redeemer Lutheran Church, Washburn, IA mharnois(a)willinet.net aa0bt(a)aa0bt.ampr.org "Waiter, there's no fly in my soup!" - Kermit the Frog

4 participants
3 comments

Re: Bad addresses in wide reply. 24 years, 3 months

ShengHuo ZHU

>>>>> "Jérôme" == Jérôme Lacoste <lacostej(a)oslo.geco-prakla.slb.com> writes: Jérôme> Pterodactyl Gnus v0.96 Jérôme> XEmacs 21.1 (patch 3) "Acadia" [Lucid] (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) of Tue Jun 29 1999 on ardbeg Jérôme> 200 news.sinet.slb.com InterNetNews NNRP server INN 2.2.1 25-Aug-1999 ready (posting ok). Jérôme> I received a mail (cf RECEIVED MAIL section), with a header containing Jérôme> a lot of addresses. An error appeared when I tried to make a Wide Jérôme> reply (cf WIDE REPLY BUFFER section) : the mail server didn't accept Jérôme> the recipients (cf trace of SMTP session BUFFER). Jérôme> Gnus apparently processed badly the recipients, Jérôme> The error appears on the recipient Jérôme> "'Lacoste, Jerome (ORK)'" <lacostej(a)oslo.geco-prakla.slb.com>, Jérôme> which is shorten to "'Lacoste, Jérôme> Thus creating a parsing error (a '" is missing). [...] Jérôme> # start of WIDE REPLY BUFFER # Jérôme> ############################## Jérôme> To: "Eriksen, Kim Moore" <kim.moore.eriksen(a)folkehelsa.no> Jérôme> Cc: "'Ashton, Alan (ORK)'" <alan.ashton(a)unitor.com>, Jérôme> "'Bach-Gansmo, Tore (NRF)'" <tore.bach-gansmo(a)radiol.uu.se>, Jérôme> "'Bavridge, Nick'" <nickb(a)euroil.no>, Jérôme> "'Bjørkevoll, Johan (ORK)'" <johan.bjorkevoll(a)dnb.no>, Jérôme> "'Bressand, Jean Yves (ORK)'" <jyb(a)paellingsen.no>, Jérôme> "'Carriere, Stephane (ORK)'" <stephane.carriere(a)total.telemax.no>, Jérôme> "'Cooper, Colin (NRF)'" <ccolin(a)online.no>, Jérôme> "'Dalton, David'" <ddalton(a)se-as.no>, Jérôme> "'Davies, Jerry (NRF)'" <jdavies(a)eunet.no>, Jérôme> "'Deck, Bertrand (ORK)'" <bertrand.deck(a)hydro.com>, Jérôme> "'Demarest, Andre (ORK)'" <andre.v.demarest(a)no.pwcglobal.com>, Jérôme> "'Dinning, Jeff'" <jeff.dinning(a)get2net.dk>, Jérôme> "'Fogalele, Robin (ORK)'" <robin_fogalele(a)dmr.ca>, Jérôme> "'Gjertsen, Roar (NRF)'" <roar.gjertsen(a)iss-shipping.com>, Jérôme> "'Guvåg, Per Arne (ORK)'" <per.1395(a)online.no>, Jérôme> "'Hall, Keith (ORK)'" <keith.hall(a)winge.no>, Jérôme> "'Hodne, Per (NRF)'" <per.hodne(a)oslore.no>, Jérôme> "'Howells, J. Huw (ORK)'" <huw_jonathan_howells(a)dmr.com>, Jérôme> "'Johansson, Bradley (ORK)'" <bradley.johansson(a)avis.no>, Jérôme> "'Jones, Philip (ORK)'" <philip.jones1(a)chase.com>, Jérôme> "'Kittilsen, Jon (NRF)'" <jokittil(a)c2i.net>, "'Lacoste, "'Larsen, Jérôme> Øyvind (ORK)'" <oey-lar(a)online.no>, "'Laugerud, Jérôme> Eirik M. (ORK)'" <laueir(a)dph.no>, "'Lie, [...] It is a bug in `rmail-dont-reply-to'. The bug has been fixed in Gnu Emacs 20.4, while the bug still exists in XEmacs mail-lib (currently 1.24). (let ((rmail-dont-reply-to-names "test")) (require 'mail-utils) (rmail-dont-reply-to "a＠b, \"Last, First\" <test＠somewhere>")) => "a＠b, \"Last" It should be (as what does in Emacs 20.4) => "a＠b" -- Shenghuo

2 participants
1 comments

Re: LDAP extended and revamped 24 years, 4 months

Oscar Figueiredo

>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Pluim <rpluim(a)bigfoot.com> writes: Robert> Hrvoje Niksic writes: >> Oscar Figueiredo <Oscar.Figueiredo(a)di.epfl.ch> writes: >> >> > *** IMPORTANT NOTE *** >> > Due to the function renaming, this patch introduces an incompatible >> > change that breaks the packages using the current LDAP API, most >> > notably EUDC and W3. >> >> Renaming doesn't necessarily entail breaking backward compatibility. >> If you want to be kind to your users, define functions with old names >> that do nothing except call the new functions. Robert> Wouldn't define-{obsolete,compatible}-function-alias be better here? Robert> Or are they intended only for 'core' emacs functions? Of course I've been concerned by this problem. But I don't know what to do for the particular case of ldap-search. Currently ldap-search is the name of the high-level search function (vs. ldap-search-internal which is the low-level function). But according to the recent discussion on the subject, what we want is the low-level function to be called ldap-search and the high-level one called something else (my patch proposes ldap-search-entries). In this particular case I don't know how to rename backward compatible. That's the reason why I didn't provide compatibility aliases at all, compatibility will be broken anyway... :-(( I am not satisfied by this but I've seen no workaround. I don't know how many packages are currently using the LDAP API. I know of two: EUDC which I maintain myself and W3. As I said, I can provide a compatible version of EUDC as soon as necessary and I guess Bill is responsive enough these days to do the same. I just hope the consequences of this incompatible change will be minor, the LDAP API has been out since version 21.0 only. Oscar

3 participants
2 comments

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

XEmacs-Beta November 1999