May 1998 - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

[Success] 21.0 "Russian White-pre6" XEmacs Lucid (beta39) on i586-pc-linux 27 years

Kai Haberzettl

No problems. > XEmacs Build Report as generated > by build-report-version 1.35 follows: > Contents of /usr/src/packages/xemacs/xemacs-21.0-b35/Installation: > (Output from most recent run of ./configure)

1 participants
0 comments

Re: [PATCH] efs-kerberos typo 27 years

Michael Sperber

>>>>> "Ray" == Raymond Toy <toy(a)rtp.ericsson.se> writes: Ray> SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org> writes: >> You will be submitting it via efs-bug in EFS, right? Michael Sperber, the >> EFS maintainer, has requested bug reports and patches to go through that >> route instead of to the XEmacs lists. Ray> Shoot. I forgot that efs bugs were supposed to be sent to Michael. Ray> I'll forward him a copy too. Already got it. Since it's just a fix, there's no problem. Generally, it's nice when other EFS maintainers not subscribed to xemacs-beta can look at problem reports. Ray> Does this mean that these patches should NOT be sent to Ray> xemacs-patches? Exactly. -- Cheers =8-} Chipsy Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

1 participants
0 comments

Re: [PATCH] efs-kerberos typo 27 years

Raymond Toy

SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org> writes: > You will be submitting it via efs-bug in EFS, right? Michael Sperber, the > EFS maintainer, has requested bug reports and patches to go through that > route instead of to the XEmacs lists. Shoot. I forgot that efs bugs were supposed to be sent to Michael. I'll forward him a copy too. Does this mean that these patches should NOT be sent to xemacs-patches? Ray

1 participants
0 comments

makeinfo 1.6.8? 27 years

Nobu Toge

Hi, I am trying b39-pre5 and I noticed that its build process wants to use makeinfo 1.68 when it is processing info files (or has it been like this for a long time?) Anyway, my makeinfo is v.1.67 that came with GNU Texinfo 3.9, and after some searching around I don't see any newer versions of Texinfo in ftp.gnu.org, etc. Where do I find makeinfo 1.68? -- Nobu Toge toge(a)accad.kek.jp toge(a)kekvax.kek.jp

2 participants
1 comments

Re: [bug] buffer-syntactic-context hosed by `(' at beginning of line 27 years

Hrvoje Niksic

Glynn Clements <glynn(a)sensei.co.uk> writes: > Odd. If I do `xemacs -vanilla', then `C-x C-f foo.c', go to the exact > line and evaluate (buffer-syntactic-context), I get `nil'. If I do > almost anything else (e.g. evaluate (buffer-syntactic-context) at a > different line or `M-x font-lock-mode') first, then I get > `block-comment'. This is because the cache gets updated right. But it still creates hard-to-track problems in many situations. For instance, I see it with font-lock-mode, and it makes modifying the line after `(' hosed. -- Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- Predestination was doomed from the start.

1 participants
0 comments

[BUG] widget-specify-active leaves push-button greyed out 27 years

Adrian Aichner

Hello All, I just verified the following bug to still exist in "21.0 \"Russian White-pre7\" XEmacs Lucid (beta39)" Recipe: M-x load-file RET we.el RET M-x widget-example RET In that buffer use Shift-TAB to go to the last toggle displaying "active" and press it. The button "Reset Form" above will go grey. When you move up with Shift-TAB you will land on another toggle displaying "active" which will make the button "Apply Form" go grey as you press the toggle. Now press the toggle again. The "Apply Form" button will stay grey BUT it is in fact activated! You can move to it and press it. This will update its display not to be greyed out. My test-case stems from the XEmacs info documentation which can be found with M-x info-query RET widget RET m Programming Example RET I have just added the widget (in)activation code. BTW: This very same example works in "GNU Emacs 20.2.1 (i386-*-nt4.0) of Tue Feb 17 1998 on ESME" AKA NTemacs. GNU Emacs however allows one to step thru inactive widgets, just not to change them. This sucks, if you ask me. Best, Adrian -- Adrian Aichner Applications Engineer Teradyne GmbH Semiconductor Test Group Telephone +49/89/41861(0)-208 Dingolfinger Straße 2 Fax +49/89/41861-217 D-81673 MÜNCHEN E-mail aichner(a)ecf.teradyne.com

2 participants
1 comments

Re: [PATCH] Changes to man/xemacs-faq.texi 27 years

Hrvoje Niksic

XEmacs FAQ Maintainer <faq(a)xemacs.org> writes: > +＠email{sds＠(a)usa.net, Sam Steingold} writes: > + > +＠quotation > +＠lisp > +; both XEmacs and Emacs > +(define-key global-map [(control right)] 'forward-word) > +＠end lisp > +or > +＠lisp > +; Emacs only Could you please change `Emacs' to `FSF Emacs' or `GNU Emacs'? XEmacs is just as much Emacs as is FSF Emacs. thanks. -- Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- The end of the world is coming... SAVE YOUR BUFFERS!

1 participants
0 comments

[Success] 21.0 "Russian White-pre6" XEmacs Lucid (beta39) on i38 6-pc-cygwin32 27 years

Michael Hill

I'm still getting the blue screen crash intermittently during 'make' but since b38 I've also had just 'make' die with this error: make.exe - DLL Initialization Failed Initialization of the dynamic link library C:\WINNT\system32\USER32.dll failed. The process is terminating abnormally. In both cases, 'make' proceeds to completion after being re-started. 'M-x shell' works and gnus will start. I don't have vm configured yet, and it starts successfully, but if I move the cursor over some of the buttons I get a seg fault. Dialog boxes and toolbar 'Info' button not yet operational. Mike > XEmacs Build Report as generated > by build-report-version 1.35 follows: > Contents of /binary/xemacs-21.0-b38/Installation: > (Output from most recent run of ./configure) uname -a: CYGWIN32_NT DILBERT 4.0 19.1 i686 unknown ./configure '--site-includes=/usr/local/include' XEmacs 21.0-b39 "Russian White-pre6" configured for `i386-pc-cygwin32'. Where should the build process find the source code? /binary/xemacs-21.0-b38 What installation prefix should install use? /usr/local What operating system and machine description files should XEmacs use? `s/cygwin32.h' and `m/intel386.h' What compiler should XEmacs be built with? gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wno-switch Should XEmacs use the GNU version of malloc? yes Should XEmacs use the relocating allocator for buffers? default What window system should XEmacs use? x11 Where do we find X Windows header files? /usr/X11R6.3/include Where do we find X Windows libraries? /usr/X11R6.3/lib Additional header files: /usr/local/include Compiling in support for XAUTH. Compiling in support for XPM images. Compiling in support for GIF image conversion. Compiling in support for JPEG image conversion. Compiling in support for PNG image conversion. Compiling in support for TIFF image conversion. Compiling in support for GNU DBM. Compiling in support for ncurses. Compiling in File coding support. Compiling in support for OffiX. Compiling in support for proper session-management. Using Lucid menubars. Using Lucid scrollbars. Using Athena dialog boxes. movemail will use "dot-locking" for locking mail spool files. Using Lisp_Objects with minimal tagbits. Using indexed lrecord implementation. Compiling in extra code for debugging. Compiling in code for checking XEmacs memory usage. WARNING: --------------------------------------------------------- WARNING: Compiling in support for runtime error checking. WARNING: XEmacs will run noticeably more slowly as a result. WARNING: Error checking is on by default for XEmacs beta releases. WARNING: --------------------------------------------------------- > /binary/xemacs-21.0-b38/beta.err does not exist!

1 participants
0 comments

Re: [FAILURE] XEmacs 21.0-beta38 on MkLinux 27 years

Hrvoje Niksic

"Stephen R. Anderson" <sra(a)bloch.ling.yale.edu> writes: > hniksic(a)srce.hr said: > > Also, you still haven't exhausted other solutions proposed by me, > > such as undefining HAVE_MATHERR in config.h. > > You're right. I haven't. And to get xemacs to compile, I don't need > to (since either Fred's suggestion or using an older version of > math.h will accomplish that). We are running in circles here. The reason why I asked you to try without HAVE_MATHERR is that having to use __exception might be a "dont-use-me" sign. > For that community (as well as most others), XEmacs should > eventually build out of the box. I agree. -- Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- We are all just prisoners here of our own MAKEDEV.

1 participants
0 comments

Re: select-window focus problem [was: Re: minor compile.el bug] 27 years

Hrvoje Niksic

Ben Wing <ben(a)666.com> writes: > console-local variables must die OK, what now? Obsolete focus-follows-mouse and introduce a pair of functions? -- Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- Oh lord won't you buy me a color TV...

2 participants
1 comments

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

XEmacs-Beta May 1998