April 1998 - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

[Success] 21.0 "Repartida-pre2" XEmacs Lucid (beta38) on i386-pc -cygwin32 26 years, 8 months

Michael Hill

Without Steve's 'make install' patch. Ian MacKinnon's Makefile fix has eliminated this error first seen in b38-pre1: MAKE='make' EMACS='./src/xemacs' sh /binary/xemacs-21.0-b37/lib-src/update-elc.sh make: *** [all-elc] Error 1 The addition of the msw toolbar broke the file open dialog box under Cygwin, giving this error in place of a dialog box: Window height 1 too small (after splitting) Configuring '--with-toolbars=no' re-enables use of the file dialog box from the menubar. Mike > XEmacs Build Report as generated > by build-report-version 1.35 follows: > Contents of /binary/xemacs-21.0-b37/Installation: > (Output from most recent run of ./configure) uname -a: CYGWIN32_NT DILBERT 4.0 19.1 i686 unknown ./configure '--site-includes=/usr/local/include' XEmacs 21.0-b38 "Repartida-pre2" configured for `i386-pc-cygwin32'. Where should the build process find the source code? /binary/xemacs-21.0-b37 What installation prefix should install use? /usr/local What operating system and machine description files should XEmacs use? `s/cygwin32.h' and `m/intel386.h' What compiler should XEmacs be built with? gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wno-switch Should XEmacs use the GNU version of malloc? yes Should XEmacs use the relocating allocator for buffers? default What window system should XEmacs use? x11 Where do we find X Windows header files? /usr/X11R6.3/include Where do we find X Windows libraries? /usr/X11R6.3/lib Additional header files: /usr/local/include Compiling in support for XAUTH. Compiling in support for XPM images. Compiling in support for GIF image conversion. Compiling in support for JPEG image conversion. Compiling in support for PNG image conversion. Compiling in support for TIFF image conversion. Compiling in support for GNU DBM. Compiling in support for ncurses. Compiling in File coding support. Compiling in support for OffiX. Compiling in support for proper session-management. Using Lucid menubars. Using Lucid scrollbars. Using Athena dialog boxes. movemail will use "dot-locking" for locking mail spool files. Using Lisp_Objects with minimal tagbits. Using indexed lrecord implementation. Compiling in extra code for debugging. Compiling in code for checking XEmacs memory usage. WARNING: --------------------------------------------------------- WARNING: Compiling in support for runtime error checking. WARNING: XEmacs will run noticeably more slowly as a result. WARNING: Error checking is on by default for XEmacs beta releases. WARNING: --------------------------------------------------------- > /binary/xemacs-21.0-b37/beta.err does not exist!

1 participants
0 comments

[Success] 21.0 "Repartida-pre2" XEmacs Lucid (beta38) on hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.00 26 years, 8 months

Marcus Thiessel

No problem. > XEmacs Build Report as generated > by build-report-version 1.35 follows: > Contents of /opt/src/xemacs-21.0-b37/Installation: > (Output from most recent run of ./configure) uname -a: HP-UX tmbbwtx B.11.00 A 9000/720 16954192 two-user license ./configure 'hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.00' '--dynamic=no' '--prefix=/usr/local/xemacs' '--with-x' '--with-dialogs=motif' '--with-xface=yes' '--with-tty=yes' '--x-includes=/usr/include/Motif1.2_R6 -I/usr/include/X11R6' '--x-libraries=/usr/lib/Motif1.2_R6 -L/usr/lib/X11R6' '--with-database=dbm' '--with-pop' '--mail-locking=lockf' '--site-includes=/usr/contrib/include -I/usr/local/include' '--error-checking=none' '--extra-verbose' '--site-libraries=/usr/contrib/lib -L/usr/local/lib' '--with-sound=no' '--with-xmu' '--with-mule=yes' '--with-cde=yes' '--with-session' '--with-tooltalk=yes' '--with-gcc=no' '--with-gnu-make=no' '--gung-ho' '--package-path=/opt/src/packages' '--cflags=+DA1.1 +DD32 +w1 +M2 +O2 +Onolimit +Odataprefetch +Oentrysched +Oprocelim +Olibcalls' XEmacs 21.0-b38 "Repartida-pre2" configured for `hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.00'. Where should the build process find the source code? /opt/src/xemacs-21.0-b37 What installation prefix should install use? /usr/local/xemacs What operating system and machine description files should XEmacs use? `s/hpux11.h' and `m/hp800.h' What compiler should XEmacs be built with? cc -Ae +DA1.1 +DD32 +w1 +M2 +O2 +Onolimit +Odataprefetch +Oentrysched +Oprocelim +Olibcalls Should XEmacs use the GNU version of malloc? yes Should XEmacs use the relocating allocator for buffers? yes What window system should XEmacs use? x11 Where do we find X Windows header files? /usr/dt/include /usr/include/Motif1.2_R6 -I/usr/include/X11R6 /usr/contrib/X11R6/include Where do we find X Windows libraries? /usr/dt/lib /usr/lib/Motif1.2_R6 -L/usr/lib/X11R6 /usr/contrib/X11R6/lib Additional header files: /usr/contrib/include -I/usr/local/include Additional libraries: /usr/contrib/lib -L/usr/local/lib Compiling in support for XPM images. Compiling in support for X-Face message headers. Compiling in support for JPEG image conversion. Compiling in support for PNG image conversion. Compiling in support for TIFF image conversion. Compiling in support for DBM. Compiling in Mule (multi-lingual) support. Compiling in XIM (X11R5+ I18N input method) support. Using Motif to provide XIM support. Compiling in support for CDE. Compiling in support for ToolTalk. Compiling in support for OffiX. Compiling in support for proper session-management. Using Lucid menubars. Using Lucid scrollbars. Using Motif dialog boxes. Compiling in DLL support. movemail will use "lockf" for locking mail spool files. Using POP for mail access Using Lisp_Objects with minimal tagbits. Using indexed lrecord implementation. Compiling in extra code for debugging. Compiling in code for checking XEmacs memory usage. > /opt/src/xemacs-21.0-b37/beta.err does not exist!

1 participants
0 comments

[PATCH] tetris under mswindows 26 years, 8 months

Andy Piper

This makes tetris (and anything else using gamegrid.el) look fab under mswindows. 1998-04-29 Andy Piper <andyp(a)parallax.co.uk> * gamegrid.el: mswindows support glyphs now, so use them. Index: games/games/gamegrid.el =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/CVSroot/XEmacs/xemacs-packages/games/games/gamegrid.el,v retrieving revision 1.1.1.1 diff -u -r1.1.1.1 gamegrid.el --- games/games/gamegrid.el 1998/01/14 06:30:31 1.1.1.1 +++ games/games/gamegrid.el 1998/04/30 18:37:18 ＠＠ -248,11 +248,11 ＠＠ (defun gamegrid-display-type () (cond ((and gamegrid-use-glyphs - (eq window-system 'x) + window-system (featurep 'xpm)) 'glyph) ((and gamegrid-use-color - (eq window-system 'x) + window-system (gamegrid-color-display-p)) 'color-x) ((eq window-system 'x)

1 participants
0 comments

Re: FW: [Failure] 21.0 "Repartida-pre2" XEmacs Lucid (beta38) on i38 6-pc-cygwin32 26 years, 8 months

SL Baur

Ian MacKinnon <IMacKinnon(a)telia.co.uk> writes: > Aha! If I put /bin in front of the sh in the makefile all is well Eh?

1 participants
0 comments

[PATCH] xpm color symbol support for mswindows 26 years, 8 months

Andy Piper

Trying to beat the code freeze... This implements color symbol support for Xpm which means tetris (with a little patch) looks fab. andy 1998-04-29 Andy Piper <andyp(a)parallax.co.uk> * console.h: xpm_normalize is not a console method anymore. * event-msw.c: honour toolbar help string length. * glyphs-msw.c: make copyright more meaningful. implement color symbol support for Xpm. (extract_xpm_color_symbols) new function. * glyphs.c (pixmap_to_lisp_data) (xpm_normalize): fucntions moved from glyphs-x.c * glyphs.h: declare pixmap_to_lisp_data. * toolbar-msw.c: more meaningful copyright.

1 participants
0 comments

Re: [Success without sgi's ifl] 21.0 "Repartida-pre1" XEmacs Lucid (beta38) on mips-sgi-irix6.2 26 years, 8 months

SL Baur

Martin Buchholz <martin(a)xemacs.org> writes: >>>>>> "Chr" == Christian Nybø <chr(a)mediascience.no> writes: Chr> In the man dir, I had to use gmake instead of sgi's make. Is it a Chr> goal of the XEmacs project to build with native cc's and make Chr> utilities, or is the object rather to breed a gnu generation of Chr> gcc/ecgs users? > We'd like to support all makes, but the functionality specified by > Posix is pretty weak. The construct in question is the use of % in > make rules in man/Makefile. I think I'm to blame for this. I don't think "blame" is the right word. I don't think it was a bad change at all, and it can probably be easily fixed. > My motivation at the time was that only developers should have to > do a `make' in man. The XEmacs tarball would have pre-built info > files, so there's nothing to do in man/. But I think later Steve > made compilation in man a required part of every build. Yup, this did change. It's not a required part of a build. One can download the -info tarball if one does not have GNU Make. We currently have tarball sizes: $ ll xemacs-21.0*.gz -r--r--r-- 1 slb xemacadm 723983 Apr 26 00:43 xemacs-21.0-b37-elc.tar.gz -r--r--r-- 1 slb xemacadm 1444298 Apr 26 00:43 xemacs-21.0-b37-info.tar.gz -r--r--r-- 1 slb xemacadm 6808096 Apr 26 00:42 xemacs-21.0-b37.tar.gz I am loathe to put anything back into the core tarball until I've heard from folks who are paying dearly for their 'net connection.

1 participants
0 comments

[Success] 21.0 "Repartida-pre2" XEmacs Lucid (beta38-pre2) on i 386-pc-cygwin32 26 years, 8 months

Ian MacKinnon

Does any one else have to hack the filename of the pre patches so patch-xemacs will work ? > XEmacs Build Report as generated > by build-report-version 1.35 follows: > Contents of /usr/xemacs-21.0-b37/Installation: > (Output from most recent run of ./configure) uname -a: CYGWIN32_NT TECH007 4.0 19.1 i686 unknown ./configure '--site-includes=/usr/local/include' XEmacs 21.0-b38 "Repartida-pre2" configured for `i386-pc-cygwin32'. Where should the build process find the source code? /usr/xemacs-21.0-b37 What installation prefix should install use? /usr/local What operating system and machine description files should XEmacs use? `s/cygwin32.h' and `m/intel386.h' What compiler should XEmacs be built with? gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wno-switch Should XEmacs use the GNU version of malloc? yes Should XEmacs use the relocating allocator for buffers? default What window system should XEmacs use? x11 Where do we find X Windows header files? /usr/X11R6.3/include Where do we find X Windows libraries? /usr/X11R6.3/lib Additional header files: /usr/local/include Compiling in support for XAUTH. Compiling in support for XPM images. Compiling in support for GIF image conversion. Compiling in support for JPEG image conversion. Compiling in support for PNG image conversion. Compiling in support for TIFF image conversion. Compiling in support for GNU DBM. Compiling in File coding support. Compiling in support for OffiX. Compiling in support for proper session-management. Using Lucid menubars. Using Lucid scrollbars. Using Athena dialog boxes. movemail will use "dot-locking" for locking mail spool files. Using Lisp_Objects with minimal tagbits. Using indexed lrecord implementation. Compiling in extra code for debugging. Compiling in code for checking XEmacs memory usage. WARNING: --------------------------------------------------------- WARNING: Compiling in support for runtime error checking. WARNING: XEmacs will run noticeably more slowly as a result. WARNING: Error checking is on by default for XEmacs beta releases. WARNING: --------------------------------------------------------- > /usr/xemacs-21.0-b37/beta.err does not exist! --- Ian

1 participants
0 comments

FW: [Failure] 21.0 "Repartida-pre2" XEmacs Lucid (beta38) on i38 6-pc-cygwin32 26 years, 8 months

Ian MacKinnon

Aha! If I put /bin in front of the sh in the makefile all is well --- Ian -----Original Message----- From: Ian MacKinnon Sent: Thursday, April 30, 1998 10:14 AM To: 'Xemacs Mailing List' Subject: [Failure] 21.0 "Repartida-pre2" XEmacs Lucid (beta38) on i386-pc-cygwin32 At the last stages of the make I get the following. Xemacs is built and is usable. I remember from the last few days some messages about dependancies in update-elc, but I can't remember what, is it possible this is what I'm seeing ? This is on cygwin with Andy's latest local.tar.gz and X Loading /usr/local/lib/xemacs/packages/lisp/vm/dumped-lisp.el... (0) MAKE='make' EMACS='./src/xemacs' sh /usr/xemacs-21.0-b37/lib-src/update-elc.sh make: *** [all-elc] Error 1 --- Ian

1 participants
0 comments

[Failure] 21.0 "Repartida-pre2" XEmacs Lucid (beta38) on i386-pc -cygwin32 26 years, 8 months

Ian MacKinnon

At the last stages of the make I get the following. Xemacs is built and is usable. I remember from the last few days some messages about dependancies in update-elc, but I can't remember what, is it possible this is what I'm seeing ? This is on cygwin with Andy's latest local.tar.gz and X Loading /usr/local/lib/xemacs/packages/lisp/vm/dumped-lisp.el... (0) MAKE='make' EMACS='./src/xemacs' sh /usr/xemacs-21.0-b37/lib-src/update-elc.sh make: *** [all-elc] Error 1 --- Ian

1 participants
0 comments

Re: Plea for minimal tagbits 26 years, 8 months

Hrvoje Niksic

Olivier Galibert <galibert(a)pobox.com> writes: > I'd like to see --use-minimal-tagbits being default, and the other > alternative actually removed. I don't think minimal tagbits should be default, because I don't see any good reasons to make them so before the new dumper is written. Yes, performance is equivalent (although I don't remember any actual study), but memory usage is not. Minimal tagbits consume more memory for conses. This will be fixed by Kyle's dumper, which will not dump free lists. 31-bit integers are nice, but they are hardly that important to a normal user. Even so, the configure option is documented in NEWS, so the interesting parties will be able to test it. Removing the old code is an even worse idea. While I personally prefer the code with less #ifdef's, being able to run regression tests is *crucial*. With the new dumper in place, it will be even more important for tracking dumper bugs. > * it removes the need for DATA_SEG_BITS which, basically, sucks > * it makes purify-like memory leak detection possible I won't comment the first reason, but if you want to purify XEmacs, nothing stops you from using minimal tagbits. -- Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- Sauron is alive in Argentina!

4 participants
7 comments

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

XEmacs-Beta April 1998