>>>> "Craig" == Craig Lanning
<CraigL(a)Knology.net> writes:
Craig> The last time I tried gcl it claimed CLtL1 compatibility which doesn't
Craig> include CLOS. Has it moved closer to ANSI Common Lisp? I already
I don't follow gcl but I don't think it's any closer. It's certainly
still missing lots of ANSI stuff like defpackage, loop, etc. CLOS is
still implemented with PCL (but then CMUCL uses PCL too). However as
a backend for xemacs it's probably doesn't matter since xemacs code
probably wouldn't use any of missing ANSI things. :-)
Ray