|--==> "UB" == Uwe Brauer <oub(a)mat.ucm.es> writes:
UB> A recent dicussion in the auctex mailing list let me belive that
UB> I am not the only person who is confused about the official pkg
UB> numbering system.
A reasonably common discussion.
UB> We had this discussion and I know that within PUI one can figure out
UB> the official package number easily.
So there's really no problem seeing as though nobody manages their
packages outside of PUI.
UB> However why would it be possible to use the official numbering scheme
UB> as a starting point and to reflect internal (Xemacs) changes by -a
UB> That is
UB> auctex-11.13-a-pkg
UB> auctex-11.14-a-pkg (new offical release ie syn)
UB> auctex-11.14-b-pkg (internal change: in the Package Makefile)
Couldn't do it because you'd have to have 2 copies of each package - a
new style version and an old style version. All XEmacsen prior to the
one that has support for the new file format wouldn't be able to cope.
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---|
| XEmacs - The only _______ you'll ever need. |
| Fill in the blank, yes, it's THAT good! |
|------------------------------------<youngs(a)xemacs.org>---|