"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
+ * cl-extra.el (cl-do-prettyprint): Work around a
"formatting" bug
+ in `report-xemacs-bug'.
Strictly speaking this isn't a workaround, it fixes a parsing bug in
cl-do-prettyprint.
+ (let ((skip (or (looking-at "((")
+ (looking-at "(prog[nv12\\(ress-feedback\\|n-with-message\\)]")
[...]
Opinions?
Making `cl-do-prettyprint' more specific looks good. How about using
`pp' or `insert' and `pp-to-string' instead for the Packages output ?