Re: Is GTK required for 22.0? No. [was: XEmacs 22.0 Release Target]

Stephen> I personally see no particular need to _have_ a HEAD. ms> But we do. All sorts of CVS history doesn't work on a branch. Yeah, it also occurred to me later that besides the history stuff, status information will be human-unreadable if we get too far away from HEAD. So I guess we do need a HEAD. But I see these issues as a bug in CVS. Current XEmacs development is more a forest than a tree. We don't really _have_ a mainline at this point, except by administrative fiat and historical accident. Besides 21.2, there is 21.2/Mule/NT, 21.2/UTF-2000, and soon 21.2/gtk-xemacs. Some of these features will probably merge soon, others not. -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."