Re: is `-name' functional?
Didier Verna <verna(a)inf.enst.fr> writes:
- What's the status of the .xemacs directory for 21.0 ? I'd
be sad
if it's not gonna make it.
It's not gonna make it. The people who are interested in that sort of
thing (I am not one of them) simply haven't put any effort into making
it work. Sorry.
- Sorry but I still think that this mess about the application class
is *evil* *Evil* *EVIL* __EVIL__. We can't possibly be the only
app in the whole universe to decide dynamically on the Xt class,
and pretend we're right. There're already so many things confusing
people about X resources. Let's not add one more.
I don't understand what you're talking about here.
- Sorry again ;-) but I still think that the modeline shouldn't
have
the same default as the default face, and shouldn't be affected by
the -bg option.
I agree with this.
--
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Try to use "ad nauseam" at least once per flame. It doesn't mean
anything; but it gives that polished feel to your postings.