2:25 p.m.
Didier Verna <verna(a)inf.enst.fr> writes:
- What's the status of the .xemacs directory for 21.0 ? I'd
be sad
if it's not gonna make it.
It's not gonna make it. The people who are interested in that sort of
thing (I am not one of them) simply haven't put any effort into making
it work. Sorry.
- Sorry but I still think that this mess about the application class
is *evil* *Evil* *EVIL* __EVIL__. We can't possibly be the only
app in the whole universe to decide dynamically on the Xt class,
and pretend we're right. There're already so many things confusing
people about X resources. Let's not add one more.
I don't understand what you're talking about here.
- Sorry again ;-) but I still think that the modeline shouldn't
have
the same default as the default face, and shouldn't be affected by
the -bg option.
I agree with this.
--
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Try to use "ad nauseam" at least once per flame. It doesn't mean
anything; but it gives that polished feel to your postings.
5:12 p.m.
New subject: is `-name' functional?
At 03:25 PM 5/19/98 +0200, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> - Sorry again ;-) but I still think that the modeline
shouldn't have
> the same default as the default face, and shouldn't be affected by
> the -bg option.
I agree with this.
How about this.
andy
1998-05-19 Andy Piper <andyp(a)parallax.co.uk>
* faces.c: create a new widget_face, make modeline and
vertical_divider faces fallback to this rather than the default.
* faces.el: give resonable defaults to the widget face.
* msw-faces.el: don't set modeline properties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
" .sigs are like your face - rarely seen by you and uglier than you think"
Dr Andy Piper, Technical Architect, Parallax Solutions Ltd
mail: andyp(a)parallax.co.uk web: www.parallax.co.uk/~andyp
6:50 p.m.
New subject: is `-name' functional?
Some time ago, Andy Piper wrote...
|+
| 1998-05-19 Andy Piper <andyp(a)parallax.co.uk>
|
| * faces.c: create a new widget_face, make modeline and
| vertical_divider faces fallback to this rather than the default.
Ben just proposed to name it 3d-object. Personally, I think that
the word "widget" means nothing outside of X context.
Kirill
9:56 p.m.
New subject: is `-name' functional?
At 09:50 PM 5/19/98 +0400, Kirill M. Katsnelson wrote:
Some time ago, Andy Piper wrote...
|+
| 1998-05-19 Andy Piper <andyp(a)parallax.co.uk>
|
| * faces.c: create a new widget_face, make modeline and
| vertical_divider faces fallback to this rather than the default.
Ben just proposed to name it 3d-object. Personally, I think that
the word "widget" means nothing outside of X context.
What's in a name?
:)
andy
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
" .sigs are like your face - rarely seen by you and uglier than you think"
Dr Andy Piper, Technical Architect, Parallax Solutions Ltd
mail: andyp(a)parallax.co.uk web: www.parallax.co.uk/~andyp
10:08 p.m.
New subject: is `-name' functional?
At 09:50 PM 5/19/98 +0400, Kirill M. Katsnelson wrote:
Some time ago, Andy Piper wrote...
|+
| 1998-05-19 Andy Piper <andyp(a)parallax.co.uk>
|
| * faces.c: create a new widget_face, make modeline and
| vertical_divider faces fallback to this rather than the default.
Ben just proposed to name it 3d-object. Personally, I think that
the word "widget" means nothing outside of X context.
Or Beer :)
[Beers like Guinness put a "widget" in the bottom of the can to make the
beer froth correctly when you open the can]
I remember why I did this - because I was copying a function with a similar
name from the same file. I suppose I should change all of them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
" .sigs are like your face - rarely seen by you and uglier than you think"
Dr Andy Piper, Technical Architect, Parallax Solutions Ltd
mail: andyp(a)parallax.co.uk web: www.parallax.co.uk/~andyp
12:55 p.m.
New subject: Widgets (was: Re: is `-name' functional?)
"Kirill M. Katsnelson" <kkm(a)kis.ru> writes:
Ben just proposed to name it 3d-object. Personally, I think that
the word "widget" means nothing outside of X context.
Try
`M-x customize-group RET widget-faces RET'
Should `widget_face' be listed there?
1:59 p.m.
New subject: Widgets (was: Re: is `-name' functional?)
At 01:55 PM 5/29/98 +0200, Per Abrahamsen wrote:
"Kirill M. Katsnelson" <kkm(a)kis.ru> writes:
> Ben just proposed to name it 3d-object. Personally, I think that
> the word "widget" means nothing outside of X context.
Try
`M-x customize-group RET widget-faces RET'
Should `widget_face' be listed there?
Maybe. xpm-button should certainly use it. I don't know if anything else is
3d-ish in customize? If it is it shoudl probably inherit from widget-face
(or whatever its called)
And while you're there :) how do I trap custom-save on a group to do some
other action (like go off and retrieve packages that you've just specified
you want)?
andy
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
" .sigs are like your face - rarely seen by you and uglier than you think"
Dr Andy Piper, Technical Architect, Parallax Solutions Ltd
mail: andyp(a)parallax.co.uk web: www.parallax.co.uk/~andyp
3:40 p.m.
New subject: Widgets (was: Re: is `-name' functional?)
Andy Piper <andyp(a)parallax.co.uk> writes:
Maybe. xpm-button should certainly use it. I don't know if
anything else is
3d-ish in customize? If it is it shoudl probably inherit from widget-face
(or whatever its called)
There's nothing 3d'ish about the widget.el widgets, my point was that
widget *does* mean something in Emacs outside an X11 context.
I think the word "widget" should be reserved the "widget.el" package
on the Emacs Lisp level.
PS: Can't you set up your Eudora mailer *not* to generate a References
header? The references header it generates is bogus, and breaks
threading.
4 p.m.
New subject: Widgets (was: Re: is `-name' functional?)
At 04:40 PM 5/29/98 +0200, Per Abrahamsen wrote:
Andy Piper <andyp(a)parallax.co.uk> writes:
> Maybe. xpm-button should certainly use it. I don't know if anything else is
> 3d-ish in customize? If it is it shoudl probably inherit from widget-face
> (or whatever its called)
There's nothing 3d'ish about the widget.el widgets, my point was that
widget *does* mean something in Emacs outside an X11 context.
Cool
I think the word "widget" should be reserved the
"widget.el" package
on the Emacs Lisp level.
*sigh* :) But you got there first.
PS: Can't you set up your Eudora mailer *not* to generate a
References
header? The references header it generates is bogus, and breaks
threading.
I'm about to switch to VM so hopefully this won't be a problem anymore.
andy
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
" .sigs are like your face - rarely seen by you and uglier than you think"
Dr Andy Piper, Technical Architect, Parallax Solutions Ltd
mail: andyp(a)parallax.co.uk web: www.parallax.co.uk/~andyp
9462
days inactive
9472
days old
8 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Andy Piper -
Hrvoje Niksic -
Kirill M. Katsnelson -
Per Abrahamsen