Hello
It seems that (again) a message of mine is spam trapped. Since a while
ago I (s/mime) sign all my messages, could this be the reason?
Uwe Brauer
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Hi,
I have had a look at the *Help:-buffer and have spotted some
inconsistencies. It seems like left-click, middle-click, right-click
and return is used differently. How should we have it?
As it is now a referens to a variable sets an extent so that
left-click and middle-click goes to the Documentation. Hitting return
with the point in the extent does nothing. Finally, right-click will
bring up a context menu with alternatives to go to Documentation, the
source or Find tag.
On the other hand, the source code link after "-- loaded from", does
not set up a link for left-click. Here middle click and return
works. Right click does nothing special, but could have had a menu for
goto source.
Wouldn't it be more consistent to let left-, middle-click and return
do the same thing. Not that important but the context menu could
include something useful for all links as well.
Comments?
Yours
--
%% Mats
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Hello --
Clang warns me that the zero on the second last line here, before the comma
operator, is unused:
#define ALLOCA(size) \
(REGEX_MALLOC_CHECK (), \
__temp_alloca_size__ = (size), \
__temp_alloca_size__ > MAX_ALLOCA_VS_C_ALLOCA ? \
xemacs_c_alloca (__temp_alloca_size__) : \
(need_to_check_c_alloca ? xemacs_c_alloca (0) : 0, \
alloca (__temp_alloca_size__)))
There’s already a sequence point after evaluating need_to_check_c_alloca, so
as far as I can tell it brings nothing and we can just remove it. Ben, if
you’re around, was there some other motivation to it?
Best,
Aidan
--
‘Liston operated so fast that he once accidentally amputated an assistant’s
fingers along with a patient’s leg, […] The patient and the assistant both
died of sepsis, and a spectator reportedly died of shock, resulting in the
only known procedure with a 300% mortality.’ (Atul Gawande, NEJM, 2012)
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta