ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2014-12-23 - 2014-12-30)
XEmacs Issue Tracking System at http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
563 open ( +0) / 317 closed ( +0) / 880 total ( +0)
Open issues with patches: 13
Average duration of open issues: 1958 days.
Median duration of open issues: 2124 days.
Open Issues Breakdown
new 255 ( +0)
deferred 6 ( +0)
napping 3 ( +0)
verified 58 ( +0)
assigned 145 ( +0)
committed 19 ( +0)
documented 3 ( +0)
done/needs work 15 ( +0)
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
The Internals manual says:
,-------------------
| The C code is actually written in a dialect of C called "Clean C",
| meaning that it can be compiled, warning-free, with either a C or C++
| compiler.
`-------------------
This doesn't seem to be true for lwlib at least (not that I care about
lwlib specifically -- I just heppened to have used my standard
configure command line). Has anyone actually compiled XEmacs with a
C++ compiler recently and has a recipe that I could borrow?
Thanks
Marcus
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2014-12-09 - 2014-12-16)
XEmacs Issue Tracking System at http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
563 open ( +0) / 317 closed ( +0) / 880 total ( +0)
Open issues with patches: 13
Average duration of open issues: 1944 days.
Median duration of open issues: 2110 days.
Open Issues Breakdown
new 255 ( +0)
deferred 6 ( +0)
napping 3 ( +0)
verified 58 ( +0)
assigned 145 ( +0)
committed 19 ( +0)
documented 3 ( +0)
done/needs work 15 ( +0)
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Hello
Has someone be able to use gnus-registry. I just tried and obtain an
error I attach. I recall a discussion on that list about the different
implementation of GNU and Xemacs, but I don't recall any details.
Uwe Brauer
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (invalid-read-syntax "#[...] used with wrong number of elements")
load-internal("registry" nil require nil raw-text-unix)
load("registry" nil require nil)
si:require(registry nil)
require(registry)
load-internal("gnus-registry" nil nil nil raw-text-unix)
load("gnus-registry" nil nil nil)
(gnus-registry-initialize)
eval((gnus-registry-initialize))
eval-interactive((gnus-registry-initialize))
eval-last-sexp(nil)
call-interactively(eval-last-sexp)
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Can someone here who uses TeX/LaTeX tell me how one defines the
subcommands (shell level) run by M-x TeX-command-master?
(Particularly the View command)
I used to use LaTeX within XEmacs all day long every day, now I use it
only sometimes, and somewhere between then and now I lost track of the
variables and whatever else is needed to accomplish that.
FWIW, I'm running "21.5 (beta33) \"horseradish\" XEmacs Lucid" on an iMac.
I've become one of the silent few who's been using forms of Emacs
since 1987, XEmacs since its earliest days, no longer an active
contributor, just a happy user. Couldn't separate me from it with a
crowbar. (I suppose I could switch to GNU Emacs if X ever goes away.)
Thanks y'all, I do quietly subscribe to this list in the background.
Been a year and a half at least since I posted anything.
--
Lynn David Newton
Columbus, Ohio
neologisticsediting.comlynndavidnewton.com
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Uwe Brauer writes:
> >> "Stephen" == Stephen J Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
>
> > Uwe Brauer writes:
>
> >> - how can we test the notation 11.88-a would work?
>
> > Somebody did already, and it doesn't.
>
>
> Again: who tested it and what went wrong?
Mats, IIRC. And what went wrong is that the version number is not
recognized by any of the pkg-admin tools; they don't know what to do
with it.
Please, give it up for now, Uwe. Doing it well is going to take a lot
of thought. It took more than 17 months to write PEP 440.[1] I
suppose we could build on that experience and cut it down
substantially, but a fair amount of work still needs to be done.
Compared to the effort required, this is among the least important
tasks facing XEmacs at this point in time, and I don't see anybody
willing to put forth the effort.
Footnotes:
[1] https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0440/
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Hello
Auctex 11.88 is out a couple of weeks ago containing significant
improvements and this time I want to synchronise it as soon as possible.
We had the discussion concerning the numeration scheme of our packages a
couple of times (without coming to an agreement).
But can I, just for Auctex, switch to a more debian like scheme???
I would call the new release
auctex-11.88-pkg.tar.gz
And changes which would be made from our side, but not by the Auctex
team:
11.88-a, 11.88-b
Or 11.88-I or whatsoever.
Rationale: it would the user allow to immediately recognise to which
official auctex version the official xemacs pkg would correspond.
Any objections to this?
regards
Uwe Brauer
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Hi all,
The Fedora project is attempting to move from 32x32 or smaller icons up to
at least 64x64, and preferably 256x256. They say that today's
high-pixel-density displays make the old icons look either (a) really tiny
or (b) fuzzy. Does anybody have, or have the capability to produce, a good
looking XEmacs icon at 64x64 or (better) 256x256? Thank you.
Non-artistically yours,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Hi all,
Is there any built-in support for streams of lisp objects? As discussed here:
https://mitpress.mit.edu/sicp/full-text/sicp/book/node70.html
Either in 21.4 or 21.5 may do.
What I mean, is that given any old lisp function that wants a list,
can I hand it a stream at it just works? I suspect the answer is
"no."
--
Johann
I'm not from the internet, I just work there.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta