Hi,
GNU has \_< and \_> construct in regular expression with the meaning
(docs for \_< below)
matches the empty string, but only at the beginning of a symbol.
A symbol is a sequence of one or more symbol-constituent
characters. A symbol-constituent character is a character whose
syntax is either `w' or `_'. `\_<' matches at the beginning of the
buffer only if a symbol-constituent character follows.
Any idea how hard it would be to support that?
Yours
--
%% Mats
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Hi, XEmacs!
1. Using an up to date XEmacs and Packages, create the following
Objective C file, class-30.m:
#########################################################################
@interface Foo
(Bar)
<X, Y, Z>
@end
@interface Foo (Bar)
<X, Y, Z>
@end
#########################################################################
2. Kill the buffer and reload the file freshly.
3. M-: (scan-lists 1 1 -1). This (correctly) returns 17, just after the
"(" on L2.
4. Put point at BOL3 ("<X ,Y, Z>"). Narrow to the first two lines with
M-<, C-x n n.
5. With point at BOL3, (point-max), do M-: (looking-at c-opt-cpp-start).
6. M-: (scan-lists 1 1 -1). This now (buggily) returns 2.
N.B. c-opt-cpp-start is "\\s *#\\s *\\([a-zA-Z0-9]+\\)".
Speculation: the regexp code shares the use of the syntax cache with the
syntax code, and somehow the `looking-at' call has fouled up the syntax
cache for `scan-lists'.
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Ar an dara lá déag de mí Aibréan, scríobh Uwe Brauer:
> >> "Aidan" == Aidan Kehoe <kehoea(a)parhasard.net> writes:
>
> > Ar an dara lá déag de mí Aibréan, scríobh Uwe Brauer:
>
> >> Thanks but I am a little confused. Judging from the date of the
> >> patch, it should be included in say 21.5.32, no? But I compiled
> >> that version....
>
> > Yes, it should be included. Hmm. Do you still have those lines in your
> > ~/.Xmodmap file?
>
> Yes,
>
> > Could you upload the output of xmodmap -pke somewhere for us?
>
> I just attach it here, (hope this is ok)
Yeah, it’s OK. Huh, now *that’s* out of the ordinary:
keycode 67 = F1 NoSymbol F1
keycode 68 = F2 NoSymbol F2
keycode 69 = F3 NoSymbol F3
keycode 70 = F4 NoSymbol F4
keycode 71 = F5 NoSymbol F5
keycode 72 = F6 NoSymbol F6
keycode 73 = F7 NoSymbol F7
keycode 74 = F8 NoSymbol F8
keycode 75 = F9 NoSymbol F9
keycode 76 = F10 NoSymbol F10
But I still can’t reproduce. If you evaluate
(setq debug-emacs-events 16)
and then press shift-f1 (or shift-f2, and so on), what do you get in your
standard error stream? I get output like:
(real) #<keypress-event shift-f1 0x21cd>
(real) #<keypress-event shift-f2 0x21cd>
--
‘Liston operated so fast that he once accidentally amputated an assistant’s
fingers along with a patient’s leg, […] The patient and the assistant both
died of sepsis, and a spectator reportedly died of shock, resulting in the
only known procedure with a 300% mortality.’ (Atul Gawande, NEJM, 2012)
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Ar an dara lá déag de mí Aibréan, scríobh Uwe Brauer:
> >> "Aidan" == Aidan Kehoe <kehoea(a)parhasard.net> writes:
>
> > Right. The shift-f1-f12 problem should have been addressed
> > comprehensively by
> > https://bitbucket.org/xemacs/xemacs/commits/f3ab0c2 . Please tell me
> > if it still doesn’t work, there are other more hackish approaches we
> > can take (among them that used by the 21.4 patch Sean has).
>
> Thanks but I am a little confused. Judging from the date of the patch,
> it should be included in say 21.5.32, no? But I compiled that version....
Yes, it should be included. Hmm. Do you still have those lines in your
~/.Xmodmap file? Could you upload the output of xmodmap -pke somewhere for us?
--
‘Liston operated so fast that he once accidentally amputated an assistant’s
fingers along with a patient’s leg, […] The patient and the assistant both
died of sepsis, and a spectator reportedly died of shock, resulting in the
only known procedure with a 300% mortality.’ (Atul Gawande, NEJM, 2012)
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Hello
I am using Kubuntu 10.04 where the shift f keys did not work in Xemacs.
Thanks to Steven Turnbull the following lines in the .Xmodmap
keysym F1 = F1
keysym F2 = F2
keysym F3 = F3
keysym F4 = F4
keysym F5 = F5
keysym F6 = F6
keysym F7 = F7
keysym F8 = F8
keysym F9 = F9
keysym F10 = F10
keysym F11 = F11
keysym F12 = F12
Did the trick.
However this does not work any longer in Ubuntu 12 and I don't have
access to very important key binding.
Anybody has an idea?
thanks
Uwe Brauer
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
I expect everybody has areas they would like to see worked on through GSoC.
One thing I would like to see is support for SVG graphics in icons and
widgets. This was mentioned on the list a couple years ago, and would
be a large stepping stone towards improving the part of XEmacs that you
see on the screen.
Steve M.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Update on this issue. When it's in the "really stuck" state (I don't know how to trigger this), I cannot minimize the XEmacs frame ... as soon as I do so, it opens itself up again. This repeats until vm-imap is finished.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Raymond Wiker writes:
> libcurl supports ftp, so that shouldn't be a problem. Another alternative
> might be a a pre emacs-lisp implementation.
w3 already supports this and more. It sucks, but don't let that
discourage you. :-)
> As an example of an ftp program that does not fit the assumptions
> made by efs: Windows 7 comes with an ftp program that does not
> support passive mode.
My condolences.
> I could install an alternative ftp client, but that option would
> only be available to users with elevated privileges,
How do these users without elevated privileges manage to install
XEmacs, then? I guess management is sufficiently clueless that they
don't realize that any Emacsen is a gaping security hole, and have
approved it? It's really not clear to me that corporate security
policy is a problem that we can do much to help solve.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2013-04-02 - 2013-04-09)
XEmacs Issue Tracking System at http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
554 open ( +0) / 296 closed ( +0) / 850 total ( +0)
Open issues with patches: 13
Average duration of open issues: 1414 days.
Median duration of open issues: 1502 days.
Open Issues Breakdown
new 235 ( +0)
deferred 6 ( +0)
napping 3 ( +0)
verified 57 ( +0)
assigned 152 ( +0)
committed 19 ( +0)
documented 3 ( +0)
done/needs work 17 ( +0)
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta