Hi,
Here comes yet another status report from the project of converting to
GPLv3 or later.
There are two lists of files below. The first list contains all files
that are in an undecided state. Please inspect: Do we need to do anything
with them. If so what?
The second list contains all files that we can leave untouched and the
reason for that. Please inspect: Are all reasons OK and correct?
Are we getting close to the were an inspection of the xemacs-gplv3
repository could be performed? With the intent that it that is OK we
could merge back to trunk and go GPLv3 or later?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"CHANGES-beta"
"ChangeLog"
"PROBLEMS"
"README"
"README.GPLv3"
"etc/ChangeLog"
"etc/Emacs.ad"
"etc/InstallGuide"
"etc/NEWS"
"etc/ONEWS"
"etc/OONEWS"
"etc/README"
"etc/editclient.sh"
"etc/emacskeys.sco"
"etc/emacsstrs.sco"
"etc/gtkrc"
"etc/package-index.LATEST.gpg"
"etc/sample.Xresources"
"etc/xemacs.1"
"lib-src/ChangeLog"
"lib-src/README"
"lisp/ChangeLog"
"lisp/README"
"lisp/mule/mule-locale.txt"
"man/ChangeLog"
"man/README"
"modules/ChangeLog"
"modules/base64/Makefile"
"modules/common/configure-post.ac"
"modules/common/configure-pre.ac"
"modules/zlib/Makefile"
"nt/ChangeLog"
"nt/Emacs.ad.h"
"nt/Installation.el"
"nt/README"
"nt/Win32.cf"
"nt/lisp.ico"
"nt/site.def"
"nt/xemacs.dsp"
"nt/xemacs.dsw"
"src/ChangeLog"
"src/README"
"src/README.kkcc"
"src/m/README"
"src/s/README"
"src/s/freebsd.h"
"src/s/irix6-0.h"
"src/s/netbsd.h"
"src/s/sol2.h"
"tests/ChangeLog"
"tests/Dnd/README"
"tests/automated/README"
"version.sh.in"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
These files below are the files that we might be able to leave as
they are. The reason for why they need not to be changed is listed
after each file: (Some reasons are taken verbatim from private
communication or the "GPL version 3 source survey")
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"INSTALL" -> old FSF Documentation license
"config.guess" -> Part of config which is still GPLv2 or later. See "http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/config"
"config.sub" -> Part of config which is still GPLv2 or later. See "http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/config"
"etc/ETAGS.ChangeLog" -> BSD and GPL v2 or later
"etc/VEGETABLES" -> Not copyrightable.
"etc/XKeysymDB" -> MIT
"etc/ctags.1" -> Part of the etags distribution, which is not part of XEmacs.
"etc/custom/example-themes/ex-custom-file" -> Generated(!?) or GPL V2 or later?
"etc/etags.1" -> Part of the etags distribution, which is not part of XEmacs.
"etc/gnuattach.1" -> simple man link to gnuserv.1
"etc/gnuclient.1" -> simple man link to gnuserv.1
"etc/gnudoit.1" -> simple man link to gnuserv.1
"etc/refcard.ps.gz" -> Generated from refcard..tex
"etc/sample.Xdefaults" -> It is deprecated, so it can be removed but is only a three line reference to .Xresources
"etc/xemacs-X.ico" -> GPLv2 or later but there is not meta data for the file where this can be documented.
"info/dir" -> Generated(?)
"install-sh" -> MIT-style "no advertising" license
"lib-src/b2m.c" -> This is the version from GNU Emacs, so should be OK.
"lib-src/config.values.in" -> Generated.
"lib-src/emacs.csh" -> I don't think this even works with XEmacs ("emacsclient"), so I believe we can just delete it.
"lib-src/insert-data-in-exec.c" -> Compatible license.
"lib-src/mmencode.c" -> Compatible license.
"lisp/dump-paths.el" -> Empty file. Not copyrightable.
"lisp/term/bobcat.el" -> Emacs version has no explicit license declaration
"lisp/term/vt102.el" -> Emacs version has no explicit license declaration
"lisp/term/vt125.el" -> Emacs version has no explicit license declaration
"lisp/term/vt200.el" -> Emacs version has no explicit license declaration
"lisp/term/vt201.el" -> Emacs version has no explicit license declaration
"lisp/term/vt220.el" -> Emacs version has no explicit license declaration
"lisp/term/vt240.el" -> Emacs version has no explicit license declaration
"lisp/term/vt300.el" -> Emacs version has no explicit license declaration
"lisp/term/vt320.el" -> Emacs version has no explicit license declaration
"lisp/term/vt400.el" -> Emacs version has no explicit license declaration
"lisp/term/vt420.el" -> Emacs version has no explicit license declaration
"lock/.precious" -> Not copyrightable.
"modules/canna/install-sh" -> MIT
"modules/ldap/install-sh" -> MIT
"modules/postgresql/install-sh" -> MIT
"modules/sample/external/install-sh" -> MIT
"modules/sample/internal/install-sh" -> MIT
"move-if-change" -> Identical to GPLv3 or later Emacs version
"nt/Xmd.patch" -> GPLv2 or later but only a few lines
"nt/file.ico" -> MIT
"nt/minitar.c" -> Public domain
"nt/paths.h" -> Generated
"nt/xemacs.ico" -> GPLv2 or later but there is not meta data for the file where this can be documented.
"src/alloca.c" -> Public domain.
"src/depend" -> Generated
"src/emacs-marshals.c" -> Generated.
"src/emacs-widget-accessors.c" -> Generated.
"src/intl-auto-encap-win32.c" -> Generated.
"src/intl-auto-encap-win32.h" -> Generated.
"src/libsst.c" -> Compatible license.
"src/libsst.h" -> Compatible license.
"src/libst.h" -> Compatible copyright.
"src/linuxplay.c" -> Compatible license. (MIT-like)
"src/miscplay.c" -> Compatible license. (MIT-like)
"src/miscplay.h" -> Compatible license. (MIT-like)
"src/nas.c" -> Compatible license. (MIT-like)
"src/paths.h.in" -> Generated.
"src/s/openbsd.h" -> Too short. (< 10 lines)
"src/s/usg5-4-2.h" -> Too short. (< 10 lines)
"src/sunplay.c" -> Compatible copyright.
"tests/gtk/UNIMPLEMENTED" -> Does notes need a license?
"tests/tooltalk/beeps.el" -> Too short. (< 10 lines)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yours
--
%% Mats
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2012-10-23 - 2012-10-30)
XEmacs Issue Tracking System at http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
553 open ( +0) / 289 closed ( +0) / 842 total ( +0)
Open issues with patches: 13
Average duration of open issues: 1267 days.
Median duration of open issues: 1343 days.
Open Issues Breakdown
new 225 ( +0)
deferred 6 ( +0)
napping 3 ( +0)
verified 56 ( +0)
assigned 153 ( +0)
committed 20 ( +0)
documented 3 ( +0)
done/needs work 18 ( +0)
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
>> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:01:17 +0200, Uwe Brauer <oub(a)mat.ucm.es> wrote:
> ================================================================
> Dear Bug Team!
> I send this message from by Kubuntu machine, but the bug in
> question concerns "MacOs, MounLion, MacPorts: xemacs21.4.22
> Mule"
> I start xemacs -vanilla turn on font-lock-mode and
> segmentation fault. Unfortunately no core is produced so I
> don't know how to debug the C bugtrace.
Sorry, should have googled more carefully. A solution or
work around or kluge is to set:
(setq progress-feedback-use-echo-area t)
Uwe Brauer
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
I've gotten a report of mail not getting through...
thanks,
mike
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2012-10-16 - 2012-10-23)
XEmacs Issue Tracking System at http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
553 open ( +0) / 289 closed ( +0) / 842 total ( +0)
Open issues with patches: 13
Average duration of open issues: 1260 days.
Median duration of open issues: 1336 days.
Open Issues Breakdown
new 225 ( +0)
deferred 6 ( +0)
napping 3 ( +0)
verified 56 ( +0)
assigned 153 ( +0)
committed 20 ( +0)
documented 3 ( +0)
done/needs work 18 ( +0)
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen J Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Stephen> Raymond Toy writes:
>> Further tracing shows that widget-push-button-value-create
>> crashes calling widget-glyph-insert-button.
>>
>> Hope this is helpful to someone who knows how the widget stuff
>> works. If there are some things you'd like me to look at let me
>> know.
Stephen> Thank you, Ray. I'll take a look at it tonight or
Stephen> tomorrow, although I can't promise to figure out what's
Stephen> going on.
Hey, no problem. I'll try to poke around some more too. I'm more
motivated now that it affects someone else besides me. Fortunately,
it's not a showstopper since I can use xemacs -nw to customize things.
Ray
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Uwe Brauer writes:
> So since customize with xemacs regular worked a while ago, I
> most likely have installed something in my Kubuntu system
> xemacs does not like.
Firefox has been really unstable for me recently, especially if some
K-rappy app is dropping dbus(?) events and spewing warnings.[1]
(Unstable enough that occasionally it takes X down with it; I've
switched to Chrome on Gentoo for the moment.) I wouldn't be surprised
if the issue in both your case and mine is upgrades to X.org itself.
Footnotes:
[1] I don't have a full KDE system, but I do use a couple of K-apps
such as kmines.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2012-10-09 - 2012-10-16)
XEmacs Issue Tracking System at http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
553 open ( +0) / 289 closed ( +0) / 842 total ( +0)
Open issues with patches: 13
Average duration of open issues: 1253 days.
Median duration of open issues: 1329 days.
Open Issues Breakdown
new 225 ( +0)
deferred 6 ( +0)
napping 3 ( +0)
verified 56 ( +0)
assigned 153 ( +0)
committed 20 ( +0)
documented 3 ( +0)
done/needs work 18 ( +0)
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Ar an cúigiú lá déag de mí Deireadh Fómhair, scríobh Uwe Brauer:
> >> On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 23:05:29 +0100, Aidan Kehoe <kehoea(a)parhasard.net> wrote:
>
> > Ar an seachtú lá de mí Deireadh Fómhair, scríobh Uwe Brauer:
>
> [snip]
>
> >>
> >> Loading this file requires xemacs, (null (function-max-args 'throw))
> >>
>
>
> > Your file was compiled by and for XEmacs 21.5.32, and is
> > incompatible with 21.4.22. In general, files compiled with XEmacs
> > 21.4 will be compatible with 21.5, but files compiled by recent
> > XEmacs 21.5 will not be compatible with 21.4, and will error early
> > as you’ve seen.
>
> Ooops!
>
> But what's about the package system then?? I was thinking to upgrade
> auctex using 21.5.32 but then the corresponding elc files wouldn't be
> 21.4.22 compatible. Or will Norbert always generate them with 21.4.22?
Well, always with the latest 21.4 version, as long as 21.4 is the stable
version.
--
‘Liston operated so fast that he once accidentally amputated an assistant’s
fingers along with a patient’s leg, […] The patient and the assistant both
died of sepsis, and a spectator reportedly died of shock, resulting in the
only known procedure with a 300% mortality.’ (Atul Gawande, NEJM, 2012)
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Ar an cúigiú lá déag de mí Deireadh Fómhair, scríobh Uwe Brauer:
> >> On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 23:05:29 +0100, Aidan Kehoe <kehoea(a)parhasard.net> wrote:
>
> > Ar an seachtú lá de mí Deireadh Fómhair, scríobh Uwe Brauer:
> >>
> >> What is the problem?
>
> > Your file was compiled by and for XEmacs 21.5.32, and is
> > incompatible with 21.4.22. In general, files compiled with XEmacs
> > 21.4 will be compatible with 21.5, but files compiled by recent
> > XEmacs 21.5 will not be compatible with 21.4, and will error early
> > as you’ve seen.
>
> BTW this break of the backward compatibility could not have
> been avoided?
Not this one, no--it involved the C-level multiple values.
--
‘Liston operated so fast that he once accidentally amputated an assistant’s
fingers along with a patient’s leg, […] The patient and the assistant both
died of sepsis, and a spectator reportedly died of shock, resulting in the
only known procedure with a 300% mortality.’ (Atul Gawande, NEJM, 2012)
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta