>> Regarding [Bug: 21.4.21] vc-annotate fails; "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> adds:
> Uwe Brauer writes:
>> I tried to vc-annotate a file under version control and
>> obtained the following error which I attach:
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> # bind (standard-output stack-trace-on-signal debug-on-signal
>> stack-trace-on-error debug-on-error ht me maxw all-me rda w a
>> revision buffer file)
> There's no error here. What's the problem?
Well the vc-annotate buffer is not displayed. I also sent a
bug report to GNU emacs since I tried it out also with GNU
emacs 23.1 (that is the latest version in Kubuntu 10.1) with
and it failed in all of them.
I then tried vc-annotate with different rev versions and
indeed then I found a critical number such that it worked for
all version below this number.
I removed the version from the branch via rcs -orev and then
vc-annotate worked again!
BTW there is no emacs command for rcs -o?
So I am not sure what to conclude, maybe I should contact
directly the author of that function.
Uwe
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Since Jerry changed the listu to build the list in the right order, is it
any faster than listN?
When does the iterative version overcome the oeverhead of recursion. I'm
sure it pretty CPU/cache sensitive,
but maybe a microbenchmark is called for.
Maybe we can get rid of list5 and/or list6?
--
Jeff Sparkes
jsparkes(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2011-03-22 - 2011-03-29)
XEmacs Issue Tracking System at http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
516 open ( +1) / 240 closed ( +0) / 756 total ( +1)
Open issues with patches: 11
Average duration of open issues: 816 days.
Median duration of open issues: 850 days.
Open Issues Breakdown
new 185 ( +0)
deferred 6 ( +0)
napping 4 ( +0)
verified 51 ( +0)
assigned 154 ( +0)
committed 26 ( +0)
documented 2 ( +0)
done/needs work 24 ( +0)
Issues Created Or Reopened (1)
______________________________
[Bug: 21.4.21] vc-annotate fails 2011-03-28
http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/issue758 created oub
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Please don't drop the mailing list. You can CC me personally if you
like, although I am subscribed to the list.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Jim Minton <minton1(a)llnl.gov> wrote:
> Hi,
> Xemacs was supplied by RHEL.
> This is a x86/64 bit system.
>
> processor : 0
> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
> cpu family : 15
> model : 4
> model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz
> Jim Minton
Yes, probably a bad function pointer, then. We'll need a better
backtrace to debug this. Can you install the xemacs-debuginfo package
from RHEL and provoke the bug again? Also, does it crash the same way
if you start with the -vanilla flag?
Is there any chance you can replace the RHEL-supplied XEmacs with your
own build? The one RedHat gave you is now 7 years old. The odds are
that we fixed the bug 6 years ago. The latest version in the 21.4
series is 21.4.22, release a little over 2 years ago. Some
distributions have switched to the 21.5 series, including the RHEL
add-on repository EPEL (for both EPEL 5 and 6).
Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
I'm wondering about the use of log2 in the patch.
1. Is it always available? Configure doesn't check for it.
2. I don't do any casting to int. This works for gcc; is it okay for other
compilers?
--
Jeff Sparkes
jsparkes(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
I just stumbled over the function session-yank-string in session.el°,
which XEmacs 21.4¹ evals fine, and so does GNU Emacs 24, while XEmacs
21.5 beta³ fails with "Invalid read syntax: #<buffer "session.el">":
(defun session-yank-string (string half-len-str callback active)
"Return menu item STRING with callback CALLBACK.
If ACTIVE is non-nil, the item is active. HALF-LEN-STR is the length of
the two parts of a abbreviated menu item name."
(let ((beg (or (and session-compact-yank-gap-regexp
(string-match "\\`[ \t\n]+" string)
(match-end 0))
0))
(end (or (and session-compact-yank-gap-regexp
(string-match "[ \t\n]+\\'" string))
(length string))))
(vector (if (> (- end beg) session-edit-menu-max-string)
(let ((gap (and session-compact-yank-gap-regexp
(string-match session-compact-yank-gap-regexp
string (- end half-len-str))
(match-end 0))))
(if (and gap (< gap (- end 3)))
(setq half-len-str (- (+ half-len-str half-len-str gap)
end))
(setq gap (- end half-len-str)))
(concat (session-subst-char-in-string
?\t ?\ (substring string beg (+ beg half-len-str)) t)
" ... "
(session-subst-char-in-string
?\t ?\ (substring string gap end) t)))
(session-subst-char-in-string ?\t ?\
(substring string beg end) t))
callback
active)))
If I remove the linefeed in the fourth-last line (so it does not end
with "...string ?\t ?\") XEmacs 21.5 beta evals the expression fine.
I wonder if this is this a bug in the elisp code or in XEmacs 21.5 beta?
Best regards,
Adam
° From the emacs-goodies-el package in Debian unstable.
¹ XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22) "Instant Classic" [Lucid] (x86_64-linux-gnu,
Mule) of Tue Jul 27 2010 on coredump
² GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.24.3) of
2011-03-23 on cigue, modified by Debian
³ XEmacs 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" 3889ef128488+ [Lucid]
(x86_64-pc-linux, Mule) of Sun Mar 27 2011 on topper
--
"Ge mig en vinterdrog, ge mig allt du har Adam Sjøgren
Kom nu jag är kroniskt låg, bara mörkret hörs" asjo(a)koldfront.dk
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Hi,
I see mails to xemacs-beta in the archive that I have not received
myself. Might be personal problem for me of course but I guess I had
to ask just to find out if I'm alone. (The missing commit-mails also
irritates me, can it be related?)
Yours
--
%% Mats
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta