Hi Jeff,
I’ve just done the above (mostly because it would have been even more
tedious for anyone else to do it), and pushed to the hg.debian.org
repository, and to https://bitbucket.org/kehoea/xemacs-gtk . There should
probably be a bitbucket repository for xemacs-gtk under
https://bitbucket.org/xemacs/ ; or, alternatively, you could put up one
under your userspace there.
Best,
Aidan
--
‘Iodine deficiency was endemic in parts of the UK until, through what has been
described as “an unplanned and accidental public health triumph”, iodine was
added to cattle feed to improve milk production in the 1930s.’
(EN Pearce, Lancet, June 2011)
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2011-09-27 - 2011-10-04)
XEmacs Issue Tracking System at http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
530 open ( +1) / 274 closed ( +0) / 804 total ( +1)
Open issues with patches: 11
Average duration of open issues: 929 days.
Median duration of open issues: 972 days.
Open Issues Breakdown
new 209 ( +1)
deferred 6 ( +0)
napping 4 ( +0)
verified 54 ( +0)
assigned 150 ( +0)
committed 19 ( +0)
documented 3 ( +0)
done/needs work 17 ( +0)
Issues Created Or Reopened (1)
______________________________
Segfault in pdump_load_finish/pdump_reloc_one_mc on Mas OS X 1 2011-10-01
http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/issue806 created anonymous
Issues Now Closed (1)
_____________________
[PATCH] fix corruption of ~/.emacs when trying to migrate an i 1349 days
http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/issue158 aidan
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Ar an dara lá is fiche de mí Méan Fómhair, scríobh Stephen J. Turnbull:
> Aidan Kehoe writes:
>
> > That would be a waste of my time and of the time of whoever
> > reverts.
>
> So why are you wasting our time with this thread?
That’s an odd comment from such a committed mailing list participant!
As far as I can see from what’s been written here, *your* opinion on this
specific question has changed, which is useful information to me. So someone
has got some value out of it, and all’s well with the world.
--
‘Iodine deficiency was endemic in parts of the UK until, through what has been
described as “an unplanned and accidental public health triumph”, iodine was
added to cattle feed to improve milk production in the 1930s.’
(EN Pearce, Lancet, June 2011)
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Ar an triochadú lá de mí Méan Fómhair, scríobh Stephen J. Turnbull:
> Aidan Kehoe writes:
>
> > That would work too, and is probably almost ideal for your
> > circumstances. (Ideal, of course, would be to have the support for
> > X-Symbol that you need included.)
>
> Have you actually looked at either of the patches in question? The
> patch to XEmacs 21.5 touches about 20 lines, gratuitously changes the
> signature of half a dozen functions, and provides absolutely no
> functionality. In short, it's an hideous hack.
>
> The patch to X-Symbol simply marshals the arguments correctly
> depending on whether the host is XEmacs 21.4 or XEmacs 21.5, and
> changes about 3 lines. Works For Me[tm] and is obviously The Right
> Thang[tm]. The only thing unpretty about it is the version
> dependence, but that is due to the deliberate change in the type of
> the MATCHSPEC argument to a number of specifier functions.
Given that it Works For You and is the Right Thing, why not commit it? Or at
least build a version of the package with that change and point Uwe towards
it, to make everyone that bit surer we’re all on the same page.
> I have no idea why the latter doesn't work for Uwe when the former
> does, as they should be functionally equivalent.
--
‘Iodine deficiency was endemic in parts of the UK until, through what has been
described as “an unplanned and accidental public health triumph”, iodine was
added to cattle feed to improve milk production in the 1930s.’
(EN Pearce, Lancet, June 2011)
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta