December 2001 - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

Re: Can't compile XEmacs 21.4.6 under cygwin 22 years, 11 months

David

Changing the cast from CBufbyte to char* will allow XEmacs to compile. "Dr. Jens Winkler" wrote: > > It failed with: > > fileio.c: In function `Fexpand_file_name': > fileio.c:955: `CBufbyte' undeclared (first use in this function) > fileio.c:955: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > fileio.c:955: for each function it appears in.) > fileio.c:955: parse error before `)' > make[1]: *** [fileio.o] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/xemacs-21.4.6/src' > make: *** [src] Error 2 > > Jens

4 participants
4 comments

[Steve Youngs <youngs@xemacs.org>] [QUERY] Re: [patch] elp doesn't work on autoloaded functions 22 years, 11 months

Simon Josefsson

Hi Barry, I have sent in a patch to xemacs-patches(a)xemacs.org to update elp.el to the version in Emacs. The file said tools-help(a)python.org was the maintainer, but that address bounces. Do you want to be listed as the maintainer? The elp.el from Emacs lists the FSF, and perhaps XEmacs could put FSF as maintainer as well, or perhaps "XEmacs Development Team". http://list-archive.xemacs.org/xemacs-patches/200112/msg00196.html http://list-archive.xemacs.org/xemacs-patches/200112/msg00199.html

2 participants
1 comments

Antialiased fonts in XEmacs ? 22 years, 11 months

Nahuel Greco

Hi, im running Debian Unstable XEmacs21 (21.4.6-2), is possible to use antialiased fonts?, is somebody working on that ? - Nahuel Greco Web Development - Open Source - - http://www.codelarvs.com.ar Game Programming - Research - - Freelance coding / sysadmin Networking. The answer is 42. -

3 participants
3 comments

Re: [patch] elp doesn't work on autoloaded functions 22 years, 11 months

Simon Josefsson

Simon Josefsson <jas(a)extundo.com> writes: > 2001-12-25 Simon Josefsson <jas(a)extundo.com> > > * elp.el: Sync with Emacs 21.1. > (top-level): Add years to copyright. Change maintainer. Remove > old version/last-modified. Fix comments. I forgot to ask: Is "tools-help(a)python.org" maintaining elp.el? I disrespectfully assumed not and changed it to FSF (as in Emacs elp.el) since the file wasn't touched since 1994. Perhaps it should be "XEmacs development team" and the bug report really go to xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org? (tools-help(a)python.org: The background of this is a Emacs sync of XEmacs elp.el to fix problems with instrumenting autoloaded functions, see xemacs-patches(a)xemacs.org mailing list.)

1 participants
1 comments

[QUERY] Re: [patch] elp doesn't work on autoloaded functions 22 years, 11 months

Steve Youngs

QUERY |--==> "SJ" == Simon Josefsson <jas(a)extundo.com> writes: SJ> Btw, text-modes/xrdb-mode.el also mentions tools-help(a)python.org. SJ> -;; Author: 1994-1996 Barry A. Warsaw SJ> -;; Maintainer: tools-help(a)python.org SJ> +;; Author: Barry A. Warsaw SJ> +;; Maintainer: FSF My advice: Check with Barry. SJ> ;; elp-reset-all. SJ> ;; SJ> ;; You can also instrument all functions in a package, provided that SJ> -;; the package follows the GNU coding standard of a common textual SJ> +;; the package follows the GNU coding standard of a common textural I'd question this change. ,----[ (dictionary-search "textual") ] | 2 definitions found | | From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913)[web1913]: | | Textual \Tex"tu*al\, a. [OE. textuel, F. textuel.] | 1. Of, pertaining to, or contained in, the text; as, textual | criticism; a textual reading. --Milton. | | 2. Serving for, or depending on, texts. --Bp. Hall. | | 3. Familiar with texts or authorities so as to cite them | accurately. ``I am not textuel.'' --Chaucer. | | From WordNet (r) 1.6[wn]: | | textual | adj : of or relating to or based on a text; "textual analysis" `---- ,----[ (dictionary-search "textural") ] | 1 definition found | | From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913)[web1913]: | | Textural \Tex"tur*al\, a. | Of or pertaining to texture. `---- -- |---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---| | XEmacs - It's not just an editor. | | It's a way of life. | |------------------------------------<youngs(a)xemacs.org>---|

1 participants
0 comments

AMEX and Chase Visa Card, Verisign Certificate, Rapid Traffic and Eif Services for all the readers.At 20% better conditions 22 years, 11 months

Paul Mac Arthur (Rapid Internet Marketing Newsletter)

1 participants
0 comments

AMEX and Chase Visa Card, Verisign Certificate, Rapid Traffic and Eif Services for all the readers.At 20% better conditions 22 years, 11 months

Paul Mac Arthur (Rapid Internet Marketing Newsletter)

1 participants
0 comments

Please comment on Online XEmacs Manuals 22 years, 11 months

Adrian Aichner

Hello XEmacs Developers, I have put the beta version of all XEmacs manuals onto our master websites a little while back. They are reachable at http://www.xemacs.org/Documentation/index.html http://www.dk.xemacs.org/Documentation/index.html http://www.us.xemacs.org/Documentation/index.html and the mirrors as well. Some questions come to mind for which I would like to solicit your input: Do the manuals work for you? Have you noticed any breakage in them? At this point I am aware of missing image files for xemacs-faq.html: /documentation/beta/html/xemacs-faq_2.html had 6 broken links /documentation/beta/html/cthomp.jpeg /documentation/beta/html/hniksic.jpeg /documentation/beta/html/jwz.gif /documentation/beta/html/mrb.jpeg /documentation/beta/html/steve.gif /documentation/beta/html/wing.gif I could have fixed these, but the general question is how to approach this problem. Should some files move from the xemacs core module to the xemacsweb module? Should the xemacs website consist of modules XEmacs/xemacsweb and XEmacs/xemacs/etc? The big questions I can't decide on are these: How many sets of manuals should we have online? o stable and gamma and beta o only beta o only stable At this point http://www.xemacs.org/Documentation/beta takes up ca. 18000KB. Should we use symbolic names as suggested above? Should we put them under specific version number directories like http://www.xemacs.org/Documentation/21.1.14/ to make references to them specific (beta was 21.2 yesterday and is 21.5 today)? Should we only use major.minor to increase the manual's lifetime and just update to latest on that branch from time to time? e.g. http://www.xemacs.org/Documentation/21.1/ Thanks in advance for your valued feedback, Adrian -- Adrian Aichner mailto:adrian＠xemacs.org http://www.xemacs.org/

5 participants
11 comments

RE: [Proposed Patch] button2 on ISO8:T in modeline toggles eol ty pe 22 years, 11 months

Wedler, Christoph

Yoshiki Hayashi wrote: > "Wedler, Christoph" <christoph.wedler(a)sap.com> writes: >> If you set `default-buffer-file-coding-system' to `iso-2022-8-dos' >> and visit a Unix file with ASCII-only characters, this file doesn't >> probably have a "apparent coding system", that's why the [buffer's >> `buffer-file-coding-system'] is `#<coding_system iso-2022-8-dos>'. > You mean there's no LF in that file? If a file does not have EOL, > XEmacs has no way to autodetect it. So in that case, you are seeing > the correct behavior. There are LFs in the file. [Not in Yoshiki's citation:] >> The eol type of the file is apparent, but not the whole coding system. I meant the same file I was talking about earlier in this thread: two lines, each containing "ab" (phew, I'm lucky, ASCII includes the control characters ;-)). As I said, the above mentioned behaviour might have changed in XEmacs-21.5.X. BTW, setting `default-buffer-file-coding-system' to `iso-2022-8-dos' is even worse when reading this file if it has CR (Mac) endings: then I get a buffer with one line: ab^Mab^M (no line ending) > I still think chaning default-buffer-file will solve most of the > cases This might be true in an environment where files have an "apparent coding system" (probably Japanese), but not with ASCII-only files: files with LF endings would be saved with CRLF the next time and files with CR endings would be read as files with one line (see above) > but I have no objection to applying your patch. As I said, it's OK for me that the patch will be applied for 21.5 only. The "[I'll send the patch] if I know the status of my other patches" was just an info: it's easier for me that way (and the patch is for 21.5.X anyway = no urgency here), it wasn't meant to give those other patches some urgency. - Christoph

2 participants
1 comments

Re: problem in downloading 22 years, 11 months

Peter Brown

Amir Lidor writes: > peter hi, > i've allready tried the installshield version, but from some reason it > crashes down whenever i try to open a file or do anything. > could it b that it's not complient with windows ME ?? > is there any difference between the 2 downloads (the installshield and the > netinstall (what is netinstall by the way ?). > tnx - amir. the netinstall one is just a different way of installing XEmacs instead of downloading the files all at once you have the option of only downloading the packages that you need try the netinstall version and see how it goes > >From: Peter Brown <rendhalver(a)users.sourceforge.net> > >Reply-To: "Rendhalver (Peter Brown)" <rendhalver(a)users.sourceforge.net> > >To: "Amir Lidor" <amir_lidor(a)hotmail.com> > >CC: xemacs-webmaint(a)xemacs.org > >Subject: Re: problem in downloading > >Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 10:53:00 +1000 > > > >Amir Lidor writes: > > >I'm using the windows ME O/S. > > >what version/files should i load to my computer (if any availiable for > >this O/S), > > > please be specific (URL will b very helpful...) > > > > > >have you looked in the Download section ?? > >try here http://www.xemacs.org/Download/win32 > >there is two ways to install XEmacs there > >a Netinstall and a InstallShield either one should work fine > > > >-- > > XEmacs Advocate | Do not try to bend the spoon, that's impossible, > > FreeBSD Devote | but try to realise the truth... There is no spoon. > > Perl Hacker | - Child Prodigy, The Matrix. > > Apache God | <mailto:rendhalver＠users.sf.net> > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. >

1 participants
0 comments

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

XEmacs-Beta December 2001