July 1999 - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

Re: Recent configure.in bugs fix 25 years, 4 months

Vin Shelton

>>>>> On Wed, 23 Jun 1999, Olivier Galibert <galibert(a)pobox.com> said: OG> Since we're not using autoheader, any #define-type option added to OG> configure.in MUST be added to src/config.h.in or it will be ignored. OG> OG. OG> PS: I apply that one immediatly. OG> 1999-06-23 Olivier Galibert <galibert(a)pobox.com> OG> * config.h.in: Add missing #undef *_USER_DEFINED. OG> Index: src/config.h.in OG> =================================================================== OG> RCS file: /usr/CVSroot/XEmacs/xemacs/src/config.h.in,v OG> retrieving revision 1.49.2.9 OG> diff -u -r1.49.2.9 config.h.in OG> --- config.h.in 1999/06/18 11:48:55 1.49.2.9 OG> +++ config.h.in 1999/06/23 22:01:06 OG> ＠＠ -798,6 +798,11 ＠＠ OG> #define MAIL_USE_LOCKF OG> #endif OG> +#undef PREFIX_USER_DEFINED OG> +#undef EXEC_PREFIX_USER_DEFINED OG> +#undef MODULEDIR_USER_DEFINED OG> +#undef SITEMODULEDIR_USER_DEFINED OG> +#undef DOCDIR_USER_DEFINED OG> #undef LISPDIR_USER_DEFINED OG> #undef PACKAGE_PATH_USER_DEFINED OG> #undef SITELISPDIR_USER_DEFINED Do any of these (specifically DOCDIR) need to be applied for 21.1? I've applied (but not committed) Michael's docdir patch for 21.1.4. - vin

1 participants
0 comments

21.2.17 changed menubar font from 21.2.15 25 years, 4 months

Matt Simmons

On this i386-pc-solaris2.7, my lucid menubars looked like this in b15: That is, they used -*-helvetica-bold-r-*-*-*-120-*-*-*-*-iso8859-* for the font. This, concidentally, is the same font as specified in src/Emacs.ad.h. In b17, it looks like this: Presumably that's one of the default CDE fonts. I tried setting the font myself in my .Xdefaults with the string from the Emacs.ad.h (with the addition of the Emacs* prefix) as follows: Emacs*menubar*Font: -*-helvetica-bold-r-*-*-*-120-*-*-*-*-iso8859-* but it doesn't work either. What happened? What can I do to return it to the earlier font? Thanks Matt -- Matt Simmons - simmonmt(a)acm.org - http://www.netcom.com/~simmonmt Whose cruel idea was it for the word "lisp" to have an "s" in it?

1 participants
0 comments

[Michael Lausch <mla@lausch.at>] xemacs component 25 years, 4 months

Jan Vroonhof

I have forwarded this do the xemacs-beta mailing list so this gets archived for posterity.

1 participants
0 comments

xemacs component 25 years, 4 months

Michael Lausch

Appended is the corba-emacs.c file, which implements the xemacs bonobo component and the makefile. Beware that the corba-emacs is _not_ the only target in the makefile. all other targets won't compile, i've used them for testing. Also the gnorba file is enclosed. Please report any ideas suggestions and other findings. I'm using xemacs 21.1.3, but i'll switch to 21.2 branch as soon as my internet connection is better. You need the newest bonobo source from CVS. You migh use test-container-autoload to test the emacs component. Beware that it might be necessary to edit test-container-autoload.c and replace "File/" in the the gnome_app_insert_menus() call with waitever string is used in yu locale for the File menu. With a german locale it's "Datei/" for example. You need to copy the xemacs-viewer executable somewhere in you path.

1 participants
0 comments

Re: [RFC] the rectangle functions 25 years, 4 months

Hrvoje Niksic

Didier Verna <verna(a)inf.enst.fr> writes: > wmperry(a)aventail.com (William M. Perry) writes: > > > As long as it doesn't screw up Emacs/W3's table rendering, I'd say > > go for it. :) > > So this is probably going to be a good test case ... How about a formal test case? `rect-tests.el' would be a welcome addition to our automated tests directory, if not to medical science.

1 participants
0 comments

Re: [RFC] the rectangle functions 25 years, 4 months

Didier Verna

wmperry(a)aventail.com (William M. Perry) writes: > As long as it doesn't screw up Emacs/W3's table rendering, I'd say go for > it. :) So this is probably going to be a good test case ... -- / / _ _ Didier Verna http://www.inf.enst.fr/~verna/ - / / - / / /_/ / ENST, INFRES C201.1 mailto:verna＠inf.enst.fr /_/ / /_/ / /__ / 46 rue Barrault Tel. +33 (1) 45 81 73 46 75013 Paris, France Fax. +33 (1) 45 81 31 19

1 participants
0 comments

Re: [RFC] the rectangle functions 25 years, 4 months

William M. Perry

Didier Verna <verna(a)inf.enst.fr> writes: > Since I've been using whitespace.el, I've noticed that most of the > rectangle functions are very intrusive: they put whitespaces in unexpected > places. The reasons are: > > 1/ move-to-column doesn't make any difference between converting a tab into > space and adding spaces at the end of a line. This is now fixed. > > 2/ operate-on-rectangle does too much blind work, notably messing with the end > of the line even for functions like string-rectangle which shouldn't be > concerned. > > > So I've rewritten rect.el to correct these problems. The rectangle > functions now avoid inserting spaces in unwanted places, unless a prefix is > given for some of them, in which case the old behavior is (sort of) used. Here > are examples of the differences, if anybody wants to comment the changes I > propose. There's notably something on which I'm not completely decided yet: > for the functions with a prefix, we could push even farther the choice: > - don't add unnecessary blanks at all (no prefix) > - add blanks on non empty lines only > - add blanks blindly (current prefix meaning) As long as it doesn't screw up Emacs/W3's table rendering, I'd say go for it. :) -bp

1 participants
0 comments

[RFC] the rectangle functions 25 years, 4 months

Didier Verna

Since I've been using whitespace.el, I've noticed that most of the rectangle functions are very intrusive: they put whitespaces in unexpected places. The reasons are: 1/ move-to-column doesn't make any difference between converting a tab into space and adding spaces at the end of a line. This is now fixed. 2/ operate-on-rectangle does too much blind work, notably messing with the end of the line even for functions like string-rectangle which shouldn't be concerned. So I've rewritten rect.el to correct these problems. The rectangle functions now avoid inserting spaces in unwanted places, unless a prefix is given for some of them, in which case the old behavior is (sort of) used. Here are examples of the differences, if anybody wants to comment the changes I propose. There's notably something on which I'm not completely decided yet: for the functions with a prefix, we could push even farther the choice: - don't add unnecessary blanks at all (no prefix) - add blanks on non empty lines only - add blanks blindly (current prefix meaning) Given a rectangle on the following lines, corners are noted with `*' (white spaces are converted to underscores): 123*45 1234 123 12 12345678*90 delete-rectangle: ================ old one / new one with a prefix: ------------------------------- 123 123 123 12_ ___ 12390 new one without prefix: ---------------------- 123 123 123 12 12390 open-rectangle: ============== old one: ------- 123_____45 123_____4 123_____ 12_____ _____ 123_____4567890 new one with a prefix: --------------------- 123_____45 123_____4 123_____ 12______ ________ 123_____4567890 new one without prefix: ---------------------- 123_____45 123_____4 123 12 123_____4567890 string-rectangle ("***"): ======================== old one: ------- 123***45_____ 123***4_ 123***_____ 12 ***_____ ***_____ 123***4567890 new one: ------- 123***45 123***4 123*** 12 *** *** 123***4567890 clear-rectangle: =============== old one / new one with a prefix: ------------------------------- 123_____ 123_____ 123_____ 12______ ________ 123_____90 new one without prefix: ------------------------ 123 123 123 12 123_____90 -- / / _ _ Didier Verna http://www.inf.enst.fr/~verna/ - / / - / / /_/ / ENST, INFRES C201.1 mailto:verna＠inf.enst.fr /_/ / /_/ / /__ / 46 rue Barrault Tel. +33 (1) 45 81 73 46 75013 Paris, France Fax. +33 (1) 45 81 31 19

1 participants
0 comments

Re: [RFC] the rectangle functions 25 years, 4 months

William M. Perry

Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> writes: > Didier Verna <verna(a)inf.enst.fr> writes: > > > wmperry(a)aventail.com (William M. Perry) writes: > > > > > As long as it doesn't screw up Emacs/W3's table rendering, I'd say > > > go for it. :) > > > > So this is probably going to be a good test case ... > > How about a formal test case? `rect-tests.el' would be a welcome > addition to our automated tests directory, if not to medical science. Well, testing it for correctness is one thing. Testing it for backwards-compatibility and not breaking existing piece-of-#!%＠! software like W3 is another test entirely. :) -bp

1 participants
0 comments

Re: [RFC] the rectangle functions 25 years, 4 months

William M. Perry

Didier Verna <verna(a)inf.enst.fr> writes: > wmperry(a)aventail.com (William M. Perry) writes: > > > As long as it doesn't screw up Emacs/W3's table rendering, I'd say go for > > it. :) > > So this is probably going to be a good test case ... Oh yea verily. It might actually help matters. Tables with colored cells can lead to some weird stuff under both emacsen right now. -Bill P.

1 participants
0 comments

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

XEmacs-Beta July 1999