July 1999 - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

Re: Discrepancy between Installation and configure 26 years, 3 months

Karl M. Hegbloom

>>>>> "sb" == SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org> writes: sb> Installation sez: sb> Compiling in DLL support. sb> but the configure option is --with-shlib/--without-shlib. sb> These need to match. Which one is the preferred name? I like `shlib' since I use Linux. `DLL' is a "Windows" term, isn't it? Or call it `dlopen', but maybe that's only the name of the lib that does that on Linux.

1 participants
0 comments

Bulk Email WITHOUT The Spam!! 26 years, 3 months

mailmachine＠stones.com

ADVERTISE YOUR PRODUCT TO THOUSANDS! NO SPECIAL BULK EMAIL SOFTWARE REQUIRED! SEND EMAIL TO ONE ADDRESS, IT GETS SENT TO THOUSANDS OF OPT-IN SUBSCRIBERS! What does this mean to you? Simple. No more spending HUNDREDS of dollars on expensive software, and no more getting shut down by your ISP for "spamming"! Send your ad to our daily updated list of over 1000 opt-in subscribers! Opt-in means the people on our lists have REQUESTED to get email ads from people just like you! These are EAGER recipients to your ad!! You also recieve OVER $500 in FREE bonuses!! Bulk email software, search engine and FFA submission software, free faxing, free classified ad submission software, and SO MUCH MORE we cant even mention it all here!! ITS AWESOME!! Membership is JUST $39 A YEAR...NO EXTRA FEES EVER!!! (Yes, we are for real. We have been in business since October 1997 with a very satisfied customer base growing daily!) For more information, reply to this email with "INFO" in the subject and we will send you all the details!

1 participants
0 comments

MULTIPLE INCOME SOURCES! 26 years, 3 months

superalliance＠mailman.zzn.com

Looking for an outstanding business opportunity? Call 1-800-204-9616 Do you qualify? Is this for you? Can you afford it? This 15 minute pre-recorded message will tell you. Then - you decide. Low cost! Minimal time required! Call 1-800-204-9616 to see if you qualify. This is a 15 minute - no obligation recorded message.

1 participants
0 comments

Pb: latest CVS sources on NT w/ Mule 26 years, 3 months

Norbert Koch

Hi, I guess this has got something to do with the changes Steve made today ... I get the following error mule-ccl.obj : error LNK2005: _Qccl_program already defined in mule-charset.obj norbert.

1 participants
0 comments

Re: Icons 26 years, 3 months

Sean MacLennan

Ben, I *really* thought this was added to the packages :-< The color and next icons are uncaptioned. Therefore you must turn off captioning to see them. The following line does this: (set-specifier toolbar-buttons-captioned-p nil) You should set this just before calling init-fancy-toolbar. I do not know why they would come on in a new frame. Sean -- |-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-| PIKA Technologies Inc. http://www.pika.ca 155 Terence Matthews Cr e-mail Sean.MacLennan(a)pika.ca Kanata, Ont, K2M 2A8 Phone (613) 591 1555 Canada Fax (613) 591 9295 |-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-|

1 participants
0 comments

reproducible crash in 21.1.4 in tcl-mode 26 years, 3 months

jsc＠arsdigita.com

I've got a reproducible crash running XEmacs 21.1.4 under Solaris 2.6 compiled with gcc. tcl-mode version is 1.50. Recipe: * xemacs -vanilla * M-x tcl-mode * \[ \] Lisp backtrace: skip-syntax-backward("/\\") # (unwind-protect ...) blink-matching-open() self-insert-command(1) # bind (arg) tcl-electric-char(1) # bind (command-debug-status) call-interactively(tcl-electric-char) # (condition-case ... . error) # (catch top-level ...) I don't have gdb or any other debugger installed right now, or I'd send in a C backtrace... sorry. -Jin

2 participants
1 comments

Re: tar-mode and crypt revisted [ patch included ] 26 years, 3 months

Hrvoje Niksic

Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> writes: > Darryl Okahata <darrylo(a)sr.hp.com> writes: > > > > > * When tar-mode.el is loaded, it overrides the definition of > > "normal-mode" with it's own definition: tar-normal-mode. > > Ouch. The best fix would probably to get rid of this. Overriding basic > XEmacs functions is always bad. Yes. See my mail in the thread. > If there is some functionality missing built it into to XEmacs > proper. Except that it's not missing. :-)

1 participants
0 comments

Re: tar-mode and crypt revisted 26 years, 3 months

Hrvoje Niksic

Darryl Okahata <darrylo(a)sr.hp.com> writes: [...] > * When tar-mode.el is loaded, it overrides the definition of > "normal-mode" with it's own definition. I don't know if this will fix the bug, but I'm pretty sure the redefinition of normal-mode for tar purposes is no longer necessary. IIRC it redefined normal mode to catch tar files containing the -*- lines and prevent tar files being thrown to the wrong mode. This is now handled with the `inhibit-first-line-modes-regexps' variable. So: try removing the code in tar-mode that overrides the `normal-mode' and see whether things work out for you.

1 participants
0 comments

Re: The plague is back: "Attempt to delete the sole visible or iconified frame" strikes again 26 years, 3 months

Hrvoje Niksic

<nic(a)niss.ac.uk> writes: > allow-deletion-of-last-visible-frame t > C-x 5 0 works when another frame is open in another workspace > > allow-deletion-of-last-visible-frame nil > C-x 5 0 _fails_ when another frame is open in another workspace > (Attempt to delete last or iconified frame) > The "X" (kill/close thing) button in the window title bar works Note that "X" will always work because it invokes the FORCE argument in delete-frame. Try pressing `C-h c' followed by the click on that "X".

1 participants
0 comments

Re: The plague is back: "Attempt to delete the sole visible or iconified frame" strikes again 26 years, 3 months

Hrvoje Niksic

SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org> writes: > I can't. What I cannot duplicate is Hrvoje's results with > WindowMaker. Regardless of the value of > `allow-deletion-of-last-visible-frame', I can C-x 5 0 a frame when > another frame is open in another workspace, i.e. WindowMaker always > does the Right Thing. NB: What version of WindowMaker do you use? I use version 0.60.0, the one from Debian (0.60.0-4).

1 participants
0 comments

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

XEmacs-Beta July 1999