September 1998 - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

Re: problem with 20.4 26 years, 7 months

Colin Rafferty

Kelly J Black writes: > I just wanted to let you know of a problem I encounters trying to > compile xemacs 20.4. I am working on an SGI Indy that has been upgraded > to an R5000 processor running under IRIX 6.5. Just to be fair, 20.4 was released before IRIX 6.5. Anyway, your compiler problems are fixed in 21.0. -- Colin

1 participants
0 comments

Re: problem with 20.4 26 years, 7 months

Hrvoje Niksic

Try out the XDEXEmacs 21 betas. I believe they include many fixes for compilation under IRIX. -- Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.

1 participants
0 comments

Re: [RFC] the behavior of search_command 26 years, 7 months

Hrvoje Niksic

Didier Verna <verna(a)inf.enst.fr> writes: > Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> writes: > > > Although your suggestion makes sense as a user-interface improvement, > > I'm certain that much code depends on case-fold-search doing what it > > says it does, no matter what the search string is. For example: > > > > (let ((case-fold-search nil)) > > (re-search-for "^Content-Length:") > > ..) > > In this particular case, my … [View More]

1 participants
0 comments

problem with 20.4 26 years, 7 months

Kelly J Black

Hello, I just wanted to let you know of a problem I encounters trying to compile xemacs 20.4. I am working on an SGI Indy that has been upgraded to an R5000 processor running under IRIX 6.5. I kept getting a compiler error in src/process.c. To fix the problem I had to change the occurances of TIOCSIGSEND to TIOCSIGNAL (starting at line 2917) and add the following line near the top: #include <sys/termios.h> Kel -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ … [View More]

1 participants
0 comments

Kerberos5 and movemail 26 years, 7 months

Soren Dayton

Hi I just noticed that FSF Emacs 20.3 supports kerberos5 in lib-src/pop.c and I was wondering if people were planning to snarf this code soon? I'd be happy to do the work if someone would warn me about any special things in the XEmacs pop.c Thanks, Soren

1 participants
0 comments

DLL stuff (working!) 26 years, 7 months

Kean Johnston

Hello again everyone. Attached is a small tar file with a patch and a new dll.c, a header file and a sample DLL module. This is very raw right now, so you will need to do a bit of work to get this working. Extract in src. Apply the patch, rebuild. You will need to edit the makefile and add "-Wl,-Bexport" to the linker flags pretty early on ... preferably by making LD=gcc -Wl,-Bexport. Then, compile the sample file with a syntax similar to: gcc -I. -Demacs -fPIC -shared -o sample.so sample.c … [View More]

1 participants
0 comments

Re: MIME attachments on NT in VM 26 years, 7 months

William M. Perry

SL Baur <steve(a)tux.org> writes: > Darryl Okahata <darrylo(a)sr.hp.com> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org: > > > Whatever happened to Kirill's database/registry patches? Way back, > > on Jan 10, he posted some patches that allowed access to the registry > > (they were in a file called "src/database-msw.c")? They never made it > > into the source tree. > > I don't recall. I vaguely recall objections that the patches weren't > … [View More]

2 participants
1 comments

Re: MIME attachments on NT in VM 26 years, 7 months

SL Baur

Darryl Okahata <darrylo(a)sr.hp.com> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org: > Whatever happened to Kirill's database/registry patches? Way back, > on Jan 10, he posted some patches that allowed access to the registry > (they were in a file called "src/database-msw.c")? They never made it > into the source tree. I don't recall. I vaguely recall objections that the patches weren't general enough. > [ They're in my archives, and I can't tell if Kirill withdrew the > … [View More]

2 participants
1 comments

Re: [RFC] the behavior of search_command 26 years, 7 months

Didier Verna

Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> writes: > Although your suggestion makes sense as a user-interface improvement, > I'm certain that much code depends on case-fold-search doing what it > says it does, no matter what the search string is. For example: > > (let ((case-fold-search nil)) > (re-search-for "^Content-Length:") > ..) In this particular case, my suggestion doesn't change anything. What I suggested is check the search string ONLY when case-fold-search … [View More]

1 participants
0 comments

Re: [PATCH] 21.2-b1 redisplay-echo-area bug 26 years, 7 months

Louis-Dominique Dubeau

Kyle Jones <kyle_jones(a)wonderworks.com> writes: > I believe this problem has been earlier identified as a GCC 2.7 > bug. Try rebuilding XEmacs using -fno-caller-saves and see if > the problem goes away. Ya, it removes the problem... I did search the archives before posting that patch to make sure I wasn't fixing something that was already fixed. Oh well... Regards, ldd

1 participants
0 comments

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

XEmacs-Beta September 1998