Re: [R21.4R21.5] `defclass' and `defmethod' autoloads

Michael Sperber writes: > > "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org&gt; writes: > > > Michael Sperber writes: > > > > > The question is how do you get it there? And in such a way that it's > > > guaranteed to be there before it gets used. > > > > I was thinking auto-autoloads. If the relevant package isn't there, > > then you're gonna be hosed anyway. > > The problem is there's no direct control over the order in which > auto-autoloads are loaded. (Or did I miss something.) I didn't see anything that immediately looked order-dependent in *autoloads*, it's more likely I missed something. Maybe this is something we should revisit for 23.0.