Re: P21.4 From netbsd
9 years, 2 months
Vin Shelton
I already applied a similar patch (derived from the gentoo patch - see
my earlier message to xemacs-patches), which i am having to rework to
be Windows-compatible.
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Hauke Fath <hf(a)spg.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Feb 2015 08:16:35 -0500, Vin Shelton wrote:
>> The vcdiff change comes from emacs and is GPLv3 and cannot be added to
>> 21.4's GPLv2 codebase.
>
> Does the 21.4 code have any mitigation for CVE-2008-1694 without that
> patch?
>
> And would you consider CVE-2009-2688 fixed in the 21.4 codebase? Are
> the Gentoo patches just belts-and-suspenders over what 21.4 implements?
> (The xemacs tracker entry is private, which is funny since there's
> documentation from a dozen Linux distributions...)
>
> Cheerio,
> hauke
>
> --
> The ASCII Ribbon Campaign Hauke Fath
> () No HTML/RTF in email Institut für Nachrichtentechnik
> /\ No Word docs in email TU Darmstadt
> Respect for open standards Ruf +49-6151-16-3281
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Patches mailing list
XEmacs-Patches(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-patches
P21.4 From netbsd
9 years, 2 months
Vin Shelton
I have culled through the netbsd patches and I think two should be
applied to the general source tree:
1. The configure.in changes to support the various netbsd platforms.
2. A change to src/dired.c to use NAME_MAX when it is available.
See attached.
The vcdiff change comes from emacs and is GPLv3 and cannot be added to
21.4's GPLv2 codebase.
- Vin
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Patches mailing list
XEmacs-Patches(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-patches
