Re: skeleton improvement
On 25 fév 2005, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
skeletons are good for forms with few options, or where the author
wants
more control.
I see.
Arguably both should be superseded by the Emacs widget library,
except
it's slow, unreliable, and hard to program with. :-)
OK this is xemacs-design isn't it? What would be the ideal "template minor
mode"? Something as flexible as skeleton, as interactive as tempo and still
easy to program?
Pierre