On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 00:06 +0100, Adrian Aichner wrote: > Jerry James <Jerry.James(a)usu.edu&gt; writes: > > > PATCH 21.5 > > > > I'm still having trouble getting Gnus up and running, so here's the most > > critical of the patches I needed to get XEmacs 21.5 going. The current > > dangling "while(0)" could cause some very interesting bugs. > > Like what? > > The missing do made the { } statement block unconditional of the while > condition, IIUC, right ? D'oh! You are right. I was worried that the while(0) would negate whatever came next, but of course there's a semicolon in between. Still, this patch should go in, but it's not nearly as urgent as I thought it was.

Thanks for the review.