Jerry James <Jerry.James(a)usu.edu> writes:
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 00:06 +0100, Adrian Aichner wrote:
> Jerry James <Jerry.James(a)usu.edu> writes:
>
> > PATCH 21.5
> >
> > I'm still having trouble getting Gnus up and running, so here's the
most
> > critical of the patches I needed to get XEmacs 21.5 going. The current
> > dangling "while(0)" could cause some very interesting bugs.
>
> Like what?
>
> The missing do made the { } statement block unconditional of the while
> condition, IIUC, right ?
D'oh! You are right. I was worried that the while(0) would negate
whatever came next, but of course there's a semicolon in between.
Still, this patch should go in, but it's not nearly as urgent as I
thought it was.
A good way to test your regained commit access :-)
Thanks for the review.
--
Adrian Aichner
mailto:adrianï¼ xemacs.org
http://www.xemacs.org/