Ar an triú lá déag de mí Lúnasa, scríobh Stephen J. Turnbull:
Sorry, I don't understand the rest of your post. I can figure it
but it would be faster if you'd annotate the code rather than refer to
"the first (second ...) result".
No, I don’t think so. The bad design makes it basically difficult to
understand in detail. There’s no way that I can see to explain it
succinctly. Code samples (and my code was annotated, at least its results
were) are about as good as it gets.
‘Liston operated so fast that he once accidentally amputated an assistant’s
fingers along with a patient’s leg, […] The patient and the assistant both
died of sepsis, and a spectator reportedly died of shock, resulting in the
only known procedure with a 300% mortality.’ (Atul Gawande, NEJM, 2012)
XEmacs-Patches mailing list