Ar an triú lá déag de mí Bealtaine, scríobh Stephen J. Turnbull:
Michael Sperber writes:
> Aidan Kehoe <kehoea(a)parhasard.net> writes:
> > Hmm, won’t that make it look under ~/Library/Application Support for
> > init.el? I don’t really want that, personally.
> Yes it would, and I think it would be the natural consequence of the
> change you're suggesting we make
+1 I'm watching this same debate over on Python-Dev. It's definitely
schizophrenic. There are people who are perfectly happy to have Unix
conventions, and there are those who want stuff in ~/Library/$PKG.
Neither camp would be happy with some stuff in ~/Library and some in a
I would be okay with a potential data-root in
/Library/Application Support/XEmacs/XEmacs Packages/ , and a potential
user-init-directory in ~/Library/Application/XEmacs , if and only if the
latter will be overridden by an existing ~/.xemacs/ .
That allows the pure Mac people to be conscientious and Mac about their work
habits, and the mixed Unix-Mac people to reasonable behaviour by default.
> ---which is why I'm somewhat dubious about it.
-0 In that same debate, the Mac fans are pretty vociferous about
wanting ~/Library. Curiously enough, these are also the people who
actually contribute to Mac-oriented stuff in Python, they're not the
> I'd rather just have it be ~/.xemacs everwhere rather than
> having platform-specific changes, even if Mac OS X conventions say
Sure, but I doubt that's what the users will say.
¿Dónde estará ahora mi sobrino Yoghurtu Nghé, que tuvo que huir
precipitadamente de la aldea por culpa de la escasez de rinocerontes?
XEmacs-Patches mailing list