Re: [PATCH] Support Carbon-specific package paths.
- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2025 -----
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2024 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2005 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2004 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2003 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
Ar an triú lá déag de mí Bealtaine, scríobh Stephen J. Turnbull:
Michael Sperber writes:
> Aidan Kehoe <kehoea(a)parhasard.net> writes:
> > Hmm, won’t that make it look under ~/Library/Application Support for
> > init.el? I don’t really want that, personally.
>
> Yes it would, and I think it would be the natural consequence of the
> change you're suggesting we make
+1 I'm watching this same debate over on Python-Dev. It's definitely
schizophrenic. There are people who are perfectly happy to have Unix
conventions, and there are those who want stuff in ~/Library/$PKG.
Neither camp would be happy with some stuff in ~/Library and some in a
.directory.
I would be okay with a potential data-root in
/Library/Application Support/XEmacs/XEmacs Packages/ , and a potential
user-init-directory in ~/Library/Application/XEmacs , if and only if the
latter will be overridden by an existing ~/.xemacs/ .
That allows the pure Mac people to be conscientious and Mac about their work
habits, and the mixed Unix-Mac people to reasonable behaviour by default.
> ---which is why I'm somewhat dubious about it.
-0 In that same debate, the Mac fans are pretty vociferous about
wanting ~/Library. Curiously enough, these are also the people who
actually contribute to Mac-oriented stuff in Python, they're not the
peanut gallery.
> I'd rather just have it be ~/.xemacs everwhere rather than
> having platform-specific changes, even if Mac OS X conventions say
> otherwise.
Sure, but I doubt that's what the users will say.
--
¿Dónde estará ahora mi sobrino Yoghurtu Nghé, que tuvo que huir
precipitadamente de la aldea por culpa de la escasez de rinocerontes?
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Patches mailing list
XEmacs-Patches(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-patches
6384
days inactive
6384
days old
0 comments
1 participants
tags (0)
participants (1)
-
Aidan Kehoe