[Sorry to but in these old discussions, I am playing catchup again]
Steve Youngs <youngs(a)xemacs.org> writes:
APA> What packaging route should we take regarding
APA> ps-print-nomule
APA> vs.
APA> ps-print-mule
APA> vs.
APA> ps-print
<disclaimer>
Adrian
If doing this delays having a new ps-print package then please don't.
We need that NOW.
</disclaimer>
Last time I looked at the FSF version of ps-print.el, the mule
dependencies of ps-print.el itself where actually quite mild. Almost
all where of the "Check for non-ascii charaters in region. If yes,call
some function from ps-print-mule". So it should be possible to have a
ps-print.el that works on both.
Jan