Carsten Leonhardt <leo(a)arioch.oche.de> writes:
Jan> Of course. That is the whole idea. In fact last time I built
an XEmacs
Jan> from scratch that was also the case. What is the problem?
I build with mule.
AFAIK, you cannot build a Mule-enabled binary
without having the compiled mule-base package around, which you cannot
generate without a Mule-enabled XEmacs...
Mule is special because it is not a real package. It is really
software that should be in the main lisp directory and tarball but
isn't because we want non-Mule user to spare download time and disk
space.
However Mule doesn't _need) the _compiled_ package, it just needs the
files around. Maybe the Makefiles need to be tweaked to allow a Mule
XEmacs to build with just the uncompiled Mule elcs around. I guess the
only thing needed for that is a target in the mule-base package
Makefile to allow a "package build" that does but produce elcs. The
result should be sufficient to bootstrap a Mule XEmacs.
Alternatively it should be possible to build the packages using temacs.
Jan